microvm-nix/microvm.nix - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

NixOS MicroVMs

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 67%

Response Time: 15h

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is microvm-nix/microvm.nix welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

microvm-nix/microvm.nix has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in microvm-nix/microvm.nix respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 14.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.6 places microvm-nix/microvm.nix in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for microvm-nix/microvm.nix?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for microvm-nix/microvm.nix is 66.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in microvm-nix/microvm.nix?

microvm-nix/microvm.nix currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

microvm-nix
microvm-nix/microvm.nixBSolid2.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
microvm-nix

microvm-nix/microvm.nix

2,896
BSolid(59/100)NINix

NixOS MicroVMs

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in microvm-nix/microvm.nix. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in microvm-nix/microvm.nix focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • 1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • 2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • 3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
14 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
66.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
66.7%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe66/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for microvm-nix/microvm.nix
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/microvm-nix/microvm.nix)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/microvm-nix/microvm.nix?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Hello, I wanted to set up a vfkit backed microvm with user-mode networking while having the ability to ssh into it and this is generally possible with vsock channel, however as of now this is not implemented microvm.nix/lib/runners/vfkit.nix Lines 117 to 118 in 2f2f62f else if vsock.cid != null then throw "vfkit vsock support not yet implemented in microvm.nix" As mentioned in a PR that introduced darwin integration, vfkit does support virtio-vsock communication, so it's a matter of how it has to be exposed by microvm, not a vfkit limitation. Ideally, I would like to have systemd-vmspawn-like experience with microvm.nix, where this channel setup happens transparently and for that some additional ssh config plumbing is required. Of course, microvm.nix should present this option in the most general way, so I wonder what would be the mi

📅 Opened May 1, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

According to systemd/systemd#24204 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/78208556b281bd6ee8a95d16a517152728010475/docs/CREDENTIALS.md?plain=1#L303 fw_cfg has a 55 bytes name length limit, and many systemd creds names are actually longer than that, e.g. opt/io.systemd.credentials/ssh.ephemeral-authorized_keys-all. SMBIOS is the new recommended way to pass in credentials.

📅 Opened Apr 27, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 15/100Contribute
Looking for more Nix beginner tasks?Explore Nix GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for microvm-nix/microvm.nix

When evaluating whether to contribute to microvm-nix/microvm.nix, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of microvm-nix/microvm.nix acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 14 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 66.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to microvm-nix/microvm.nix

01

Is microvm-nix/microvm.nix welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

microvm-nix/microvm.nix has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~14 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.6 places microvm-nix/microvm.nix in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for microvm-nix/microvm.nix?

The external pull request merge rate is 66.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in microvm-nix/microvm.nix?

Yes, microvm-nix/microvm.nix currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for microvm-nix/microvm.nix are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.