yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Auditable bioinformatics workflow compiler: Catalog-bound planning, Workflow IR, and validated WDL 1.0.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 100%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 72.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 72.2 places yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow?

yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

yuanzhw
yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflowA•Welcoming102
GitHub
Back to Explorer
yuanzhw

yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow

102
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(72/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Auditable bioinformatics workflow compiler: Catalog-bound planning, Workflow IR, and validated WDL 1.0.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.3/10
Patience Score
7.4/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Strict review standards in yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Call out API, migration, or compatibility impact clearly

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not hide breaking changes in implementation details
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
100.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
100.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe100/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Context The current Catalog has compile-ready bulk RNA-seq, reference-preparation, and ChIP-seq paths. A bounded single-cell recipe will extend family-level retrieval and compiler evaluation without claiming an end-to-end general scRNA-seq platform. Scope 10x HDF5 → QC → normalization → highly variable genes → PCA/neighbors → Leiden → UMAP → marker genes Acceptance criteria Add a scrnaseq_qc_clustering RecipeSpec for the scoped path. Add a complete scanpy_qc_clustering ToolSpec with explicit inputs, outputs, parameters, command, runtime, and execution-verification status. If a project-maintained wrapper is required, include its Dockerfile, packaged scripts, smoke_test.sh, and minimal execution evidence. Add a structured example plan and cover Catalog resolution, Workflow IR, deterministic WDL rendering, WOMtool 92 validation, and miniwdl compatibility. Convert the existing scRNA-seq negative retrieval query to supported and add bulk-versus-single-cell confusion cases wit

📅 Opened Sep 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Context The public Catalog page currently renders a maintained static preview even though the API already exposes recipe and tool listing endpoints. Loading the page from those endpoints will make the trust boundary inspectable without duplicating Catalog definitions in the frontend. Acceptance criteria Replace the static recipe and tool arrays with data from /api/recipes and /api/tools. Present recipe inputs, steps and scatter structure, allowed tools, tool schemas, runtime references, and execution-verification status. Add clear loading, empty, and API-error states. Do not infer, repair, or silently replace Catalog fields in the Web layer. Add focused data-mapping tests and pass the existing Web lint, tests, and production build. Contributor note Keep the first pull request focused on read-only presentation. Catalog mutation and administration are outside this issue.

📅 Opened Sep 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow

When evaluating whether to contribute to yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow

01

Is yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 72.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 72.2 places yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow?

The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow?

Yes, yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for yuanzhw/AI-bioworkflow are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.