yegor256/rultor - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

DevOps team assistant that helps you merge, deploy, and release GitHub-hosted apps and libraries

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 55/100

External PR Merge Rate: 36%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is yegor256/rultor welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

yegor256/rultor has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in yegor256/rultor respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 55.3 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 55.3 places yegor256/rultor in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for yegor256/rultor?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for yegor256/rultor is 36.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in yegor256/rultor?

yegor256/rultor currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

yegor256
yegor256/rultorB•Solid574
GitHub
Back to Explorer
yegor256

yegor256/rultor

574
InactiveB•Solid(55/100)Java

DevOps team assistant that helps you merge, deploy, and release GitHub-hosted apps and libraries

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
7.1/10
Patience Score
7.5/10
Nitpick Rate
37%

Balanced & professional review environment in yegor256/rultor. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
36.4%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
36.4%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe33/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for yegor256/rultor
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/yegor256/rultor)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/yegor256/rultor?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Tail.FakeConnect.read() in src/main/java/com/rultor/agents/daemons/Tail.java reads the daemon directory with this.xml.xpath("/talk/daemon/dir/text() "), with a trailing space inside the XPath expression. Every other caller in the same file uses /talk/daemon/dir/text() without the trailing space, including SSHConnect.read() ten lines earlier and EndsDaemon.process() in the neighbouring class. The trailing space is tolerated by the current XPath engine, but the expression is no longer recognised by a literal search of the codebase, and the cosmetic drift between two callers that mean the same thing is a footgun the next time someone tries to refactor or grep for the XPath. The mismatch slipped past xslint because the literal is a Java string, not an XSL document. Drop the trailing space on the text() call at line 259 so the FakeConnect path matches the rest of the file. No behaviour change is expected.

📅 Opened Jun 12, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

src/main/java/com/rultor/Time.java, iso() at lines 66-71 and parse(String) at lines 86-93. iso() formats the millis in GMT and emits a trailing Z. parse(String) builds a SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss", Locale.US) and never calls setTimeZone, so the parser interprets the input in the JVM default time zone. SimpleDateFormat.parse is also lenient about trailing characters, so the Z written by iso() is silently dropped and never enforced. The result is that new Time(new Time(msec).iso()).msec() differs from msec by the JVM offset on every host where the default zone is not GMT/UTC. The daemon round-trips through these two methods on every build: started and ended are written via iso() into the talk XML and read back via new Time(string) in EndsRequest and elsewhere, so the elapsed-time numbers exposed to users are wrong by the offset on any non-UTC host, and the wall-clock columns shown on the website are wrong by the same offset. Smallest fix in parse(String): mirror iso() by se

📅 Opened Jun 9, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Quite often, when I try to merge a pull request using Rultor, I get a confusing error like this: git push origin master remote: error: GH013: Repository rule violations found for refs/heads/master. remote: - A conversation must be resolved before this pull request can be merged. To github.com:objectionary/lints.git ! [remote rejected] master -> master (push declined due to repository rule violations) error: failed to push some refs to 'github.com:objectionary/lints.git' The problem is that the error comes from git push at the very end of the merge process — after Docker is started and the full build is run. At that point, the error message is raw and unhelpful. In this particular case, I had to figure out on my own that the rejection was caused by an outdated (but unresolved) review thread left by a reviewer on an already-superseded commit. GitHub branch protection rules can block a merge for various reasons: unresolved review conversations, missing required approvals, failing re

📅 Opened Jun 6, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

In src/main/java/com/rultor/agents/daemons/StartsDaemon.java, lines 209-218, the upload() method iterates over the entries of Profile.assets() and pipes each value to a remote shell: for (final Map.Entry<String, InputStream> asset : this.profile.assets().entrySet()) { shell.exec( String.format( "cat > %s", Ssh.escape(String.format("%s/%s", dir, asset.getKey())) ), asset.getValue(), Logger.stream(Level.INFO, true), Logger.stream(Level.WARNING, true) ); ... } Profile.assets() is declared in src/main/java/com/rultor/spi/Profile.java as returning Map<String, InputStream>, where the values are raw InputStream instances that the caller owns. Shell.exec() consumes the stream but does not close it. The loop discards each InputStream reference at the end of an iteration without ever calling close(). Every asset declared in .rultor.yml therefore leaks one InputStream per build start. With memory-backed profiles the l

📅 Opened Jun 2, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

What happens In src/main/java/com/rultor/agents/req/Decrypt.java, the GPG decryption command is built by interpolating the symmetric passphrase directly into a shell command line: final String script = String.format( "gpg --batch --decrypt --passphrase %s ...", Ssh.escape(String.format("rultor-key:%s", this.profile.name())) ); The passphrase rultor-key:<profile-name> is the actual symmetric secret used to decrypt the repository's .enc files. It is embedded into the run.sh script that StartsDaemon uploads to the build host, where run.sh runs under set -ex (StartsDaemon writes set -ex -o pipefail at the top of every script). With -x, bash prints every command — including this one with the passphrase — to stdout. That stdout is captured into the rultor build log, which is published. So a single rultor build of a public project writes the decryption passphrase in plaintext into a log that is publicly readable. Any reader who also obtains the .enc files can decrypt the repositor

📅 Opened May 11, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for yegor256/rultor

When evaluating whether to contribute to yegor256/rultor, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of yegor256/rultor acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 36.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to yegor256/rultor

01

Is yegor256/rultor welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

yegor256/rultor has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 55.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 55.3 places yegor256/rultor in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for yegor256/rultor?

The external pull request merge rate is 36.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in yegor256/rultor?

Yes, yegor256/rultor currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for yegor256/rultor are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.