xybrid-ai/xybrid - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Cross-platform on-device AI toolkit

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 70/100

External PR Merge Rate: 93%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is xybrid-ai/xybrid welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xybrid-ai/xybrid has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in xybrid-ai/xybrid respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 70.0 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 70.0 places xybrid-ai/xybrid in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xybrid-ai/xybrid?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for xybrid-ai/xybrid is 93.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in xybrid-ai/xybrid?

xybrid-ai/xybrid currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

xybrid-ai
xybrid-ai/xybridS•Elite470
GitHub
Back to Explorer
xybrid-ai

xybrid-ai/xybrid

470
Active (30d)S•Elite(70/100)Rust

Cross-platform on-device AI toolkit

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in xybrid-ai/xybrid. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
93.1%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
66.7%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
4 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
93.1%
Merge Gauge
66.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe57/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for xybrid-ai/xybrid
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/xybrid-ai/xybrid)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/xybrid-ai/xybrid?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Use Case The whisper.cpp fix enables suppress_nst so bracketed annotations such as [BLANK_AUDIO] do not appear in ordinary transcripts. whisper.cpp defaults this flag to false, and some callers may want its non-speech tokens instead of cleaned text. The setting is fixed inside the backend, so callers cannot choose. Proposed Solution Add an explicit ASR option, tentatively suppress_non_speech_tokens, to RunOptions or its ASR-specific configuration. Pass it through the SDK, core runtime, and foreign bindings to TranscribeParams and whisper.cpp. This is a decoding capability, so it should not add another run* method. Document one default across backends. We need to choose between: suppression on, preserving clean transcripts and the behavior introduced by the current fix; suppression off, matching whisper.cpp's upstream default. Add tests for both values. The suppressed case should keep bracketed annotations out of the transcript. The raw case should use a fixture that emits an annotati

📅 Opened Aug 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Current behavior xybrid-ffi-facade and xybrid-bolt expose an opaque conversation context plus context-aware run and streaming calls. The generated Apple and Kotlin bindings can create a context, add turns, set a system prompt, prune history, and pass that context into inference. The React Native spec has no conversation handle or context-aware inference path. A JS caller cannot use the SDK's multi-turn conversation state. Scope Add an opaque native context handle on iOS and Android, with explicit release and cleanup during module invalidation. Add a TypeScript ConversationContext wrapper for the bolt surface: create, create with an ID, push a role-aware envelope, set the system envelope, clear history, read the ID and history length, inspect whether a system prompt is set, and set the maximum history length. Let both Model.run() and Model.runStreaming() receive a context without adding capability suffix chains to the public JS API. Map the JS context handle to XybridConversationContex

📅 Opened Aug 4, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Context The Unity starter only ships XybridDemoController.cs (TTS). Community requests for ASR examples have come in. Adding a second controller gives Unity developers a clear template that mirrors what we already provide on iOS. Scope Add examples/unity/starter/Assets/Scripts/XybridAsrController.cs. Use Microphone.Start to record from the default input device. Load whisper-tiny (already in the registry). Display the transcript in an on-scene Text element. Out of scope Changes to the Unity binding itself (bindings/unity/). New scene assets beyond what's needed to wire the script. Acceptance criteria Recording produces a transcript in the Unity scene. Starter README mentions both demos. No changes outside examples/unity/starter/. References examples/unity/starter/Assets/Scripts/XybridDemoController.cs (TTS reference) examples/ios/XybridExample/ContentView.swift (iOS ASR pattern)

📅 Opened Jun 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Context crates/xybrid-core/examples/resnet50_imagenet.rs:88 prints "Resize to 256x256 (TODO - currently passthrough)". The preprocessing pipeline doesn't actually resize, so the example produces wrong predictions unless inputs are already the right size. Visible UX bug that misleads anyone evaluating the SDK with the example. Scope Pick one of two paths: Add a Resize preprocessing step to the execution template system (preferred — benefits all vision models). Look at crates/xybrid-core/src/execution/preprocessing/image.rs for the pattern. Inline image::imageops::resize in the example before envelope creation. Either way, remove the "TODO" line in the print statement. Out of scope Adding general image preprocessing beyond what the example needs (other models can add their own steps). Replacing the image crate dependency. Acceptance criteria Example correctly classifies a sample image (top-1 in the expected ImageNet bucket). If Resize step added: documented in the metadata schem

📅 Opened Jun 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Context PostprocessingStep::TemperatureSample is stubbed at crates/xybrid-core/src/execution/postprocessing/mod.rs:60. This is needed for non-llama.cpp logit-output models (small classification heads, custom LMs run via ONNX) where we want to sample rather than take argmax. Medium difficulty — wants someone comfortable with sampling primitives but doesn't need Xybrid internals. Scope Implement temperature scaling (logits / temperature). Implement top-k filtering. Implement top-p (nucleus) filtering. Final multinomial sample via a seedable RNG so tests are deterministic. Accept all three parameters via the step's config. Out of scope Beam search, repetition penalties, frequency penalties, or other advanced sampling tricks. Modifying llama.cpp's existing sampler path. Acceptance criteria Unit tests verify: temperature=0 ≈ argmax, top-k=1 ≈ argmax, top-p=1.0 + high temp ≈ uniform over allowed tokens. Determinism with a fixed seed. Clear error on invalid params (negative te

📅 Opened Jun 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for xybrid-ai/xybrid

When evaluating whether to contribute to xybrid-ai/xybrid, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of xybrid-ai/xybrid acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 93.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to xybrid-ai/xybrid

01

Is xybrid-ai/xybrid welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xybrid-ai/xybrid has a recorded first-timer success rate of 66.7%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 70.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 70.0 places xybrid-ai/xybrid in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xybrid-ai/xybrid?

The external pull request merge rate is 93.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in xybrid-ai/xybrid?

Yes, xybrid-ai/xybrid currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for xybrid-ai/xybrid are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.