xuiltul/animaworks - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Organization-as-Code for autonomous AI agents. Brain-inspired memory that grows, consolidates, and forgets. Multi-model (Claude/Codex/Gemini/Cursor/Ollama).

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 53/100

External PR Merge Rate: 69%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is xuiltul/animaworks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xuiltul/animaworks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in xuiltul/animaworks respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 52.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 52.6 places xuiltul/animaworks in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xuiltul/animaworks?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for xuiltul/animaworks is 68.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in xuiltul/animaworks?

xuiltul/animaworks currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

xuiltul
xuiltul/animaworksB•Solid266
GitHub
Back to Explorer
xuiltul

xuiltul/animaworks

266
InactiveB•Solid(53/100)Python

Organization-as-Code for autonomous AI agents. Brain-inspired memory that grows, consolidates, and forgets. Multi-model (Claude/Codex/Gemini/Cursor/Ollama).

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in xuiltul/animaworks. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
68.9%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
68.9%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe46/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for xuiltul/animaworks
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/xuiltul/animaworks)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/xuiltul/animaworks?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Summary Improve accessibility by adding aria-label and aria-describedby attributes to interactive elements in the web UI. What to do Audit server/static/ for buttons, inputs, and controls that lack accessibility attributes. Priority areas: Theme selector cards Chat input and send button Voice chat controls (mic, stop) Settings page toggles and sliders Navigation links and sidebar items Modal close buttons How to verify Use browser DevTools Accessibility panel to check for missing labels Run Lighthouse accessibility audit Test with a screen reader if possible Notes Use descriptive labels (e.g. aria-label="Send message" not aria-label="Button") Localized strings can use the i18n system if applicable, but English-only is fine as a first pass

📅 Opened Mar 11, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Summary Add a Simplified Chinese locale to the template system. AnimaWorks uses locale-based template directories (templates/ja/, templates/en/) for prompts, common knowledge, skills, and Anima scaffolding. What to do Create templates/zh/ mirroring the structure of templates/en/ Translate all Markdown files from English into Simplified Chinese Scope ~150 files across these categories: Directory Content prompts/ System prompt fragments (builder, environment, behavior rules) common_knowledge/ Shared knowledge docs (organization, operations, security, troubleshooting) common_skills/ Skill definitions (tool usage guides) anima_templates/ Anima scaffolding (identity, injection, permissions, heartbeat) roles/ Role-specific templates (engineer, manager, writer, etc.) bootstrap.md First-run instructions Reference templates/en/ — English (source of truth) templates/ja/ — Japanese (for reference) Notes This is a large task — partial PRs are welcome (e.g. just commo

📅 Opened Mar 11, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for xuiltul/animaworks

When evaluating whether to contribute to xuiltul/animaworks, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of xuiltul/animaworks acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 68.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to xuiltul/animaworks

01

Is xuiltul/animaworks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xuiltul/animaworks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 52.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 52.6 places xuiltul/animaworks in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xuiltul/animaworks?

The external pull request merge rate is 68.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in xuiltul/animaworks?

Yes, xuiltul/animaworks currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for xuiltul/animaworks are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.