Git as the control plane for AI-native software engineering | AI Native 软件工程的 Git 变更控制手册
C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 63/100
External PR Merge Rate: 100%
Response Time: 5h
First Timer Success: 100%
xirong/my-git has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in xirong/my-git respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 5.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 62.7 places xirong/my-git in the B tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for xirong/my-git is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
xirong/my-git currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".
Active maintainer team in xirong/my-git welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/xirong/my-git?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Calculating local time...
Calculating local time...
Detected: UTC
Maintainers are most responsive around 06:00 UTC (06:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Monday - Wednesday from 09:00 to 13:00 UTC (09:00 - 13:00 UTC local).
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~4 hours (96% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~25 hours (45% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Background The company practice section is valuable because it connects public engineering practices to concrete team decisions. It should stay source-backed and practical. Scope Review 10-company-practices/ for: Source freshness Broken or outdated references Overly broad claims Missing links back to theme guides Opportunities to add small, practical decision notes Priority cases: Google Code Review Shopify Merge Queue Microsoft Release Flow Meta Sapling Microsoft Scalar Slack Deploys Done When Case studies clearly link to original sources. Claims are framed as lessons or references, not universal rules. Related handbook articles are linked where useful. python3 scripts/check-docs.py passes.
Background AI-generated code review is one of the most important parts of the v2 handbook. The current content explains the principles well, but more concrete examples would help developers apply the workflow. Scope Add or improve examples covering: Large AI diff review Splitting AI changes into logical commits Detecting unrelated file changes Reviewing generated tests Writing PR descriptions for AI-assisted changes Deciding when to ask a human reviewer to stop and split the change Possible target files: 05-ai-native-development/ai-change-review-example.md 05-ai-native-development/ai-generated-code-review.md 05-ai-native-development/ai-commit-splitting.md Done When Examples are realistic and copyable. Risk checks are concrete, with file or diff-level thinking. The English version is updated when needed. python3 scripts/check-docs.py passes.
Background The handbook depends on official Git, GitHub, OpenAI, Anthropic, Atlassian, and company practice references. External links should stay fresh, especially outside the archived legacy section. Scope Review external links in active documentation directories. Skip 09-resources/legacy/ unless a link is referenced from an active guide. Prefer official documentation, source repositories, release notes, and primary sources. Replace outdated links when a stable official URL exists. Mark outdated resources clearly when keeping them for historical context. Done When Broken or redirected links in active docs are fixed or documented. No historical resource is presented as the primary learning path. python3 scripts/check-docs.py passes. git diff --check passes.
Background The handbook now has English versions for the main content. Some high-traffic guides still need one more editing pass to read like native technical writing. Scope Start with the entry points and core guides: README.md 05-ai-native-development/05-ai-native-development_en/ai-native-git-workflow_en.md 05-ai-native-development/05-ai-native-development_en/codex-claude-code-git-practices_en.md 05-ai-native-development/05-ai-native-development_en/ai-generated-code-review_en.md 03-team-collaboration/03-team-collaboration_en/team-git-workflow-guide_en.md 04-github-engineering/04-github-engineering_en/github-engineering-governance_en.md 06-troubleshooting/06-troubleshooting_en/git-troubleshooting-playbook_en.md 10-company-practices/10-company-practices_en/company-practices-decision-map_en.md Done When The edited guides keep the same structure and meaning. Awkward literal translations are replaced with natural technical English. Internal links still pass python3 scripts/check-docs.p
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to xirong/my-git, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of xirong/my-git acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 5 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
xirong/my-git has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~5 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 62.7 places xirong/my-git in the Solid tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
Yes, xirong/my-git currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.
All metrics displayed for xirong/my-git are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.