xiaotonng/pikiloom - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Put the world's smartest AI agents & plugins in your pocket

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 54/100

External PR Merge Rate: 95%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is xiaotonng/pikiloom welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xiaotonng/pikiloom has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in xiaotonng/pikiloom respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 54.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 54.5 places xiaotonng/pikiloom in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xiaotonng/pikiloom?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for xiaotonng/pikiloom is 95.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in xiaotonng/pikiloom?

xiaotonng/pikiloom currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

xiaotonng
xiaotonng/pikiloomB•Solid294
GitHub
Back to Explorer
xiaotonng

xiaotonng/pikiloom

294
InactiveB•Solid(54/100)TypeScript

Put the world's smartest AI agents & plugins in your pocket

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Collaborative maintainer environment in xiaotonng/pikiloom. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
95.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
95.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe68/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for xiaotonng/pikiloom
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/xiaotonng/pikiloom)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/xiaotonng/pikiloom?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Problem When using Pikiclaw for multiple tasks, once the number of sessions exceeds ~5-10, it becomes very difficult to recall: What tasks were previously sent and whether they were valuable What the agent's feedback/results were for each task Which sessions are worth revisiting vs. which are noise This is true across both IM (Telegram/Feishu) and the dashboard — the current session list is flat and chronological with no summarization, search, or filtering. Users end up manually scrolling through conversations or the dashboard trying to piece together what happened. Why This Matters Pikiclaw encourages an async, fire-and-forget workflow — send tasks and check back later. But without a way to efficiently review past sessions, users lose track of their own work. The more productive the tool is, the worse this problem gets. Possible Directions Session summaries: Auto-generate a one-line summary for each completed session (task intent + outcome) Search/filter: Allow searching sessio

📅 Opened Mar 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for xiaotonng/pikiloom

When evaluating whether to contribute to xiaotonng/pikiloom, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of xiaotonng/pikiloom acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 95.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to xiaotonng/pikiloom

01

Is xiaotonng/pikiloom welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xiaotonng/pikiloom has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 54.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 54.5 places xiaotonng/pikiloom in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xiaotonng/pikiloom?

The external pull request merge rate is 95.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in xiaotonng/pikiloom?

Yes, xiaotonng/pikiloom currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for xiaotonng/pikiloom are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.