xdslproject/xdsl - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A Python compiler design toolkit.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 82%

Response Time: 8d

First Timer Success: 77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is xdslproject/xdsl welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xdslproject/xdsl has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.9%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in xdslproject/xdsl respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 190.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.8 places xdslproject/xdsl in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xdslproject/xdsl?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for xdslproject/xdsl is 81.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in xdslproject/xdsl?

xdslproject/xdsl currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

xdslproject
xdslproject/xdslAWelcoming580
GitHub
Back to Explorer
xdslproject

xdslproject/xdsl

580
AWelcoming(59/100)Python

A Python compiler design toolkit.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Growing Python project in xdslproject/xdsl welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
7 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.7%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
76.9%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
18 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.7%
Merge Gauge
76.9%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe56/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for xdslproject/xdsl
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/xdslproject/xdsl)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/xdslproject/xdsl?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Summary xDSL currently has limited tiling support compared with upstream MLIR. At the moment, xdsl can tile some simple linalg.generic ops, but mostly only for static-shape memrefs. The current implementation is structured as: OperandTileInfo.analyze: computes how each operand should be sliced. TilingPlan.analyze_generic_op: builds a tiling plan for one linalg.generic. _verify_generic_is_tileable: rejects unsupported cases. _build_tile_loops: builds the outer scf.for loops. _build_tiled_subview: builds memref.subview ops for tiled operands. tile_linalg_generic: main entry point. Calls the helper functions, creates the tiled linalg.generic. One note: memref.subview itself can handle dynamic offsets/sizes/strides, but the current Linalg tiling flow still rejects dynamic operand shapes and uses static integer tile sizes / loop bounds. Missing compared with upstream MLIR Linalg tiling is currently missing support for: tensor-based tiling dynamic shapes / dynamic tile sizes partial ti

📅 Opened May 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 80/100Contribute

We're currently missing: RUF001 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/ambiguous-unicode-character-string RUF002 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/ambiguous-unicode-character-docstring RUF003 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/ambiguous-unicode-character-comment RUF005 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/collection-literal-concatenation RUF007 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/zip-instead-of-pairwise RUF012 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/mutable-class-default RUF015 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/unnecessary-iterable-allocation-for-first-element RUF018 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/assignment-in-assert RUF033 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/post-init-default RUF043 - https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/rules/pytest-raises-ambiguous-pattern Any of these would be great to do, ideally one PR per rule.

📅 Opened Apr 26, 2026💬 9 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for xdslproject/xdsl

When evaluating whether to contribute to xdslproject/xdsl, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of xdslproject/xdsl acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 7 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to xdslproject/xdsl

01

Is xdslproject/xdsl welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

xdslproject/xdsl has a recorded first-timer success rate of 76.9%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~7 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.8 places xdslproject/xdsl in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for xdslproject/xdsl?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in xdslproject/xdsl?

Yes, xdslproject/xdsl currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for xdslproject/xdsl are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.