wzh4869/AppPorts - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

📦 A macOS utility to seamlessly migrate applications to external storage and reclaim local disk space.【一款 macOS 工具,无缝迁移应用到外部存储并自动建立链接,释放宝贵的本地空间】

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 48/100

External PR Merge Rate: 100%

Response Time: 7d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is wzh4869/AppPorts welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

wzh4869/AppPorts has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in wzh4869/AppPorts respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 163.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 48.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 48.5 places wzh4869/AppPorts in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for wzh4869/AppPorts?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for wzh4869/AppPorts is 100.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in wzh4869/AppPorts?

wzh4869/AppPorts currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

wzh4869
wzh4869/AppPortsB•Solid2.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
wzh4869

wzh4869/AppPorts

2,114
InactiveB•Solid(48/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Swift

📦 A macOS utility to seamlessly migrate applications to external storage and reclaim local disk space.【一款 macOS 工具,无缝迁移应用到外部存储并自动建立链接,释放宝贵的本地空间】

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in wzh4869/AppPorts. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in wzh4869/AppPorts focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
6 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
100.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
100.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe40/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for wzh4869/AppPorts
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/wzh4869/AppPorts)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/wzh4869/AppPorts?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

本项目的现有图标源于 Gemini,但在耐看度上还有所欠缺。如果哪位朋友有更好的设计想法或草图,欢迎随时提出! The current project icon is derived from Gemini, but it leaves a bit to be desired in terms of long-term visual appeal. If anyone has any better design ideas or rough sketches, please feel free to share them! 设计要求 / Design Requirements: 风格趋向于极简主义。 请避免使用纯字母组合或字母变形的设计。 图标主题可以具有某种象征性或寓意。 如果你对作品很有信心,上方的要求可以忽略 Style: Leaning towards minimalism. Avoid: Please refrain from using pure letter combinations or typography-based distortions. Theme: The icon's theme can carry some form of symbolism or metaphor. Note: If you are highly confident in your work, the above requirements can be completely ignored. 如果你不会设计或者画画,也极为欢迎分享你的核心思路或灵感。

📅 Opened May 29, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Swift beginner tasks?Explore Swift GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for wzh4869/AppPorts

When evaluating whether to contribute to wzh4869/AppPorts, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of wzh4869/AppPorts acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 6 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 100.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to wzh4869/AppPorts

01

Is wzh4869/AppPorts welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

wzh4869/AppPorts has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~6 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 48.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 48.5 places wzh4869/AppPorts in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for wzh4869/AppPorts?

The external pull request merge rate is 100.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in wzh4869/AppPorts?

Yes, wzh4869/AppPorts currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for wzh4869/AppPorts are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.