woodpecker-ci/woodpecker - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Woodpecker is a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 70%

Response Time: 20h

First Timer Success: 71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is woodpecker-ci/woodpecker welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

woodpecker-ci/woodpecker has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.8%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in woodpecker-ci/woodpecker respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 20.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.6 places woodpecker-ci/woodpecker in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for woodpecker-ci/woodpecker?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for woodpecker-ci/woodpecker is 69.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in woodpecker-ci/woodpecker?

woodpecker-ci/woodpecker currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

woodpecker-ci
woodpecker-ci/woodpeckerA•Welcoming7.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
woodpecker-ci

woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

7,921
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(67/100)Go

Woodpecker is a simple, yet powerful CI/CD engine with great extensibility.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
8.4/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
19%

Highly encouraging & supportive maintainers (71% positive review sentiment). Active code reviews with constructive guidance for new contributors in woodpecker-ci/woodpecker.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
20 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
69.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
70.8%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
43 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
69.7%
Merge Gauge
70.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe64/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for woodpecker-ci/woodpecker
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Clear and concise description of the problem path conditions are only evaluated for push and pull_request events (constraint.go#L184-186). On a tag event the path filter is silently ignored and the step always runs, even when written in the same when entry: when: - event: tag path: images/foo/** # no-op on tag; step runs regardless This makes it impossible to gate work on a tagged release by what changed. The concrete use case is a release pipeline that rebuilds only the images whose build context changed since the previous tag. Suggested solution Evaluate path for event: tag as it is for push/PR, diffing previousTag..tag. when: - event: tag path: images/foo/** # runs only if images/foo changed since the previous release Defining "previous tag" is a design decision. The natural default is the nearest tag in the tagged commit's ancestry (git describe --tags --abbrev=0 <tag>^), i.e. graph-nearest; this equals the previous release on linear tag history. Graph-distance, cre

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

When evaluating whether to contribute to woodpecker-ci/woodpecker, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of woodpecker-ci/woodpecker acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 20 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 69.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to woodpecker-ci/woodpecker

01

Is woodpecker-ci/woodpecker welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

woodpecker-ci/woodpecker has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.8%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~20 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.6 places woodpecker-ci/woodpecker in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for woodpecker-ci/woodpecker?

The external pull request merge rate is 69.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in woodpecker-ci/woodpecker?

Yes, woodpecker-ci/woodpecker currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for woodpecker-ci/woodpecker are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.