wilbowes/EchoMuse - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Alexa replacement and controller for Echo Dot 2nd Generation device.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 18%

Response Time: 4h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is wilbowes/EchoMuse welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

wilbowes/EchoMuse has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in wilbowes/EchoMuse respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 3.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.2 places wilbowes/EchoMuse in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for wilbowes/EchoMuse?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for wilbowes/EchoMuse is 18.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in wilbowes/EchoMuse?

wilbowes/EchoMuse currently has 12 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

wilbowes
wilbowes/EchoMuseAWelcoming296
GitHub
Back to Explorer
wilbowes

wilbowes/EchoMuse

296
AWelcoming(63/100)Python

Alexa replacement and controller for Echo Dot 2nd Generation device.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Python project in wilbowes/EchoMuse welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
3 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
18.2%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
11 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
18.2%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe34/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for wilbowes/EchoMuse
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/wilbowes/EchoMuse)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/wilbowes/EchoMuse?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

I'd like to add support for the Echo Show 8 (1st gen) running LineageOS as a second device alongside the Echo Dot 2nd Gen, and wanted to share the intended shape early to get your feedback before writing much code. Approach. The controller is model-agnostic (capability-negotiated), so this is almost entirely a second set of device bindings. The plan is to reuse the whole board-agnostic core (wake word, beamformer, AEC, networking, server) and write fresh hardware bindings for the Show behind a new crown build tag, mirroring the existing server tag — one binary per board, no runtime hardware detection. Key decisions so far: One binary per board, selected by build tag (not runtime detection). The Show owns the audio hardware exclusively for now, exactly like the Dot; sharing with other Android apps via the Android audio stack is deferred. A decorative model label ("Echo Show 8") in the handshake — display only, nothing branches on it; behaviour stays capability-driven. No LED ring o

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

What happened A provisioned device stopped reconnecting to WiFi after a reboot and would not recover without manual intervention. The other two devices in the fleet were unaffected. The device was scanning correctly and seeing the AP's BSSID in results, but never attempting association. Root cause (confirmed via logcat) WifiStateMachine showed numNoInternetAccessReports: 103 for the configured network against only 19 successful associations: D/WifiStateMachine: numAssociation 19 D/WifiStateMachine: numNoInternetAccessReports 103 Android 5.1's WifiAutoJoinController uses this counter to block auto-join on networks it considers unreliable. On a local-only network (no WAN, only a LAN controller), Android's captive portal detection marks every successful connection as "no internet access," incrementing this counter on every boot until auto-join is permanently suppressed. The device was scanning and the AP was visible, but WifiStateMachine never issued an association attempt. wpa_cli list_

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

There is no brightness setting today. The only LED config keys are ledScene, ledListenColor and ledThinkColor — checked, not assumed. So this is new work rather than plumbing something existing through to HA. That matters for ordering: brightness has to exist as a controllable value before anything — Home Assistant, an automation, or the ambient light sensor (#295) — can drive it. The user-facing problem A twelve-LED ring at full output is a lamp. In a dark bedroom at 3am it is the brightest thing in the room, and the only way to stop it today is to pick a scene that happens to be dimmer. Scope ledBrightness as a device config key, in the ring section, scoped per device like the rest of that section. Someone will want the bedroom dim and the kitchen bright, and the fleet/device split already handles that. Applied at render, not per scene. It scales whatever the priority system is currently drawing, so it works for the listening ring, the volume arc, the mute indicator and the pl

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

The dashboard is verified by someone opening it and clicking around. That catches a lot, and it has already missed things that a machine would not have. Three increments, each useful on its own. Deliberately not a "UAT project" — the full click-every-control suite comes last, if the cheap ones earn their keep. The enabling change already landed PR #287 added a CI job that boots the controller in the built image and waits for Controller ready. Everything below hangs off that: a browser test needs a running controller, and now CI has one. A fake device is a script rather than hardware — the WebSocket protocol is ours. 1. Console-error check (cheapest, do first) Boot the controller, drive a headless browser through every tab, fail on any browser console error. Would have caught `${color}88` immediately. That worked while every colour was a literal, and the moment call sites became var(--lcd-green) it produced var(--lcd-green)88 — invalid CSS that drops the whole declaration. The LCD

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

handle_control is 704 lines — the largest function in the project, and the one PR #280 re-indented wholesale to wrap in a try/except. That guard was the right fix for the symptom (one bad message took down the device's voice satellite, BLE proxy and data plane together). It does not address why an 834-line re-indent was needed to add it: eleven message types share one function and one scope. What to do Extract a handler per message type, leave a dispatch table. Roughly: CONTROL_HANDLERS = { "button": handle_button_event, "ambient_light": handle_ambient_light, "mute_state": handle_mute_state, "volume_state": handle_volume_state, "stats": handle_stats, "wifi_result": handle_wifi_result, "playback_stats": handle_playback_stats, ... } Two things this buys beyond readability: Each handler becomes testable on its own. The suite cannot import em_controller, so today none of these are covered by anything. A handler taking (device, m

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for wilbowes/EchoMuse

When evaluating whether to contribute to wilbowes/EchoMuse, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of wilbowes/EchoMuse acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 18.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to wilbowes/EchoMuse

01

Is wilbowes/EchoMuse welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

wilbowes/EchoMuse has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.2 places wilbowes/EchoMuse in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for wilbowes/EchoMuse?

The external pull request merge rate is 18.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in wilbowes/EchoMuse?

Yes, wilbowes/EchoMuse currently has 12 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for wilbowes/EchoMuse are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.