Fully transparent SSH, HTTPS, Kubernetes, database and RDP/VNC bastion/PAM that doesn't need additional client-side software
C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 65/100
External PR Merge Rate: 85%
Response Time: 2d
First Timer Success: 60%
warp-tech/warpgate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
Maintainers in warp-tech/warpgate respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 39.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.
The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 65.2 places warp-tech/warpgate in the A tier.
The external contributor pull request merge rate for warp-tech/warpgate is 84.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.
warp-tech/warpgate currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".
Collaborative maintainer environment in warp-tech/warpgate. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.
Average Response Latency
Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.
External Acceptance Rate
Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.
First PR Conversion
Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.
Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.
[](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/warp-tech/warpgate?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)
Historical health & responsiveness evolution
External PR acceptance
First PR success rate
50% receive response in
90% receive response in
Maintainer review activity heatmap & prime window prediction
Calculating local time...
Calculating local time...
Detected: UTC
Maintainers are most responsive around 12:00 UTC (12:00 UTC in your timezone). Recommended submission window is Wednesday - Friday from 10:00 to 14:00 UTC (10:00 - 14:00 UTC local).
Limited recent maintainer review activity recorded for this repository. Prediction based on heuristic baseline.
Maintainer Strategy: Maintainer Sweet Spot: PRs under 150 lines merge in ~25 hours (96% approval). Large PRs (>500 lines) take ~187 hours (38% approval). Keep your diff compact for rapid review.
Enter your branch size and test coverage below to forecast review turnaround and get 1-click git splitting commands.
Alternative open-source projects with active maintainers in Rust.
rust raft with improvements
MOROS: Obscure Rust Operating System 🦉
A networking library to make multiplayer games for the Bevy game engine
[FE] Log Admin UI: Proposed Optimization Strategy to Fix Performance Issues Context Currently, the Log page in the admin UI becomes unresponsive and causes high CPU/memory usage when the log count grows (even at ~1500+ entries). Observed Behavior Aggressive Polling: The frontend issues high-frequency requests to /api/logs. DOM Bloat: Every new log entry is appended to the UI without a cleanup mechanism. With Svelte 5's fine-grained reactivity, rendering thousands of complex log rows (containing JSON metadata) eventually freezes the browser's main thread. Memory Leak Risk: Since older entries aren't destroyed from the frontend state, memory usage increases linearly over time. Proposed Optimization Strategy 1. Frontend Buffer Limit (Circular Buffer) Problem: Storing an infinite number of log entries in the Svelte store leads to OOM (Out of Memory). Solution: Implement a hard cap on the frontend log array (e.g., MAX_LOGS = 500). When the limit is reached, the oldest entries should be s
Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.
Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.
When evaluating whether to contribute to warp-tech/warpgate, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.
Currently, maintainers of warp-tech/warpgate acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.
warp-tech/warpgate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.
The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.
The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 65.2 places warp-tech/warpgate in the Welcoming tier.
The external pull request merge rate is 84.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.
Yes, warp-tech/warpgate currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.
All metrics displayed for warp-tech/warpgate are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.