uutils/coreutils - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Cross-platform Rust rewrite of the GNU coreutils

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 63%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is uutils/coreutils welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

uutils/coreutils has a recorded first-timer success rate of 49.5%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in uutils/coreutils respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.8 places uutils/coreutils in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for uutils/coreutils?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for uutils/coreutils is 63.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in uutils/coreutils?

uutils/coreutils currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

uutils
uutils/coreutilsA•Welcoming24.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
uutils

uutils/coreutils

24,233
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(67/100)Rust

Cross-platform Rust rewrite of the GNU coreutils

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in uutils/coreutils. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
49.5%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
112 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.3%
Merge Gauge
49.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe40/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for uutils/coreutils
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/uutils/coreutils)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/uutils/coreutils?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

GNU ls --dired ends its output with //DIRED-OPTIONS// --quoting-style=<name>, where <name> is the canonical name of the quoting style in effect. uutils prints the Display form of the internal QuotingStyle enum instead (impl fmt::Display for QuotingStyle in src/uucore/src/lib/features/quoting_style/mod.rs, used at src/uu/ls/src/dired.rs:128), so most style names come out wrong. ls -l --dired <opt> a | tail -1 through a pipe, uutils main vs GNU coreutils 9.12: option uutils prints GNU prints --quoting-style=literal, -N literal literal --quoting-style=shell shell-show-control shell --quoting-style=shell-always shell-always-quote-show-control shell-always --quoting-style=shell-escape shell-escape-show-control shell-escape --quoting-style=shell-escape-always shell-escape-always-quote-show-control shell-escape-always --quoting-style=c, -Q C c --quoting-style=escape, -b C escape --quoting-style=locale literal locale --quoting-style=clocale C clocale QUOTING_STYLE=she

📅 Opened Sep 21, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

ls --zero should terminate every line with NUL instead of newline. This works for -1 and -m, but when --zero is given before a column format option (-C or -x), the last line is still terminated by \n. Reproduce (in a directory containing a and b), uutils main vs GNU coreutils 9.12: $ coreutils ls --zero -C a b | od -An -c a b \n $ ls --zero -C a b | od -An -c a b \0 $ coreutils ls --zero -x a b | od -An -c a b \n $ ls --zero -x a b | od -An -c a b \0 ls --zero -1, ls --zero -m, and ls -C --zero (where --zero comes last and resets the format to -1) already match GNU. The GNU test tests/ls/zero-option.sh only covers the -C --zero ordering. The following addition passes on GNU 9.12 and fails on uutils main: # --zero must also terminate column output with NUL when it precedes -C or -x mkdir dir2 && touch dir2/a dir2/b || framework_failure_ printf 'a b\0' > exp || framework_failure_ for opt in -C -x; do LC_ALL=C ls --zero $opt -w

📅 Opened Sep 21, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

printf panics instead of printing when a numeric conversion is given a field width above 65535: $ printf '%65536d' 5 thread 'main' panicked at src/uucore/src/lib/features/format/num_format.rs:781:17: Formatting argument out of range note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace $ echo $? 101 GNU prints the padded field and exits 0: $ /usr/bin/printf '%65536d' 5 | wc -c 65536 The boundary is exactly u16::MAX: %65535d works, %65536d panics. It affects numeric conversions (%d, %f, ...) but not %s, so %65536s is fine. The cause is that the width is passed straight to Rust's formatting machinery, which only accepts a width that fits in a u16. The fix is to stop relying on format! for the padding once the width exceeds that, and emit the padding directly. Where src/uucore/src/lib/features/format/num_format.rs, in the NumberAlignment handling — the write!(writer, "{s:>width$}", ...) / write!(writer, "{sign_indicator}{s:>remaining_width$}") calls (around line

📅 Opened Aug 10, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute

Summary GNU date honours strftime flags and widths on %N (nanoseconds). uutils ignores or mishandles them: %_3N should space-pad to width 3, and %-N should still emit the full 9-digit default, but uutils emits a single 0. Found by a fuzz_date run. Reproduction $ LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC /usr/bin/date -d '@0' '+%_3N' | od -c | head -1 0000000 0 \n $ LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC target/debug/coreutils date -d '@0' '+%_3N' | od -c | head -1 0000000 0 \n $ LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC /usr/bin/date -d '@0' '+%-N' 000000000 $ LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC target/debug/coreutils date -d '@0' '+%-N' 0 Test #[test] fn test_date_strftime_n_width_and_flags() { new_ucmd!() .env("LC_ALL", "C") .env("TZ", "UTC") .arg("-d") .arg("@0") .arg("+%_3N") .succeeds() .stdout_is("0 \n"); new_ucmd!() .env("LC_ALL", "C") .env("TZ", "UTC") .arg("-d") .arg("@0") .arg("+%-N") .succeeds() .stdout_is("000000000\n"); }

📅 Opened Apr 5, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Summary GNU date treats composite strftime specifiers (%D, %F, %T, %r, %R, %c, %x, %X) as atomic: flags like - apply to the whole expansion, not to inner sub-fields. uutils lets the - flag propagate into the inner %m, producing 6/15/24 instead of 06/15/24. Found by a fuzz_date run. Reproduction $ LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC /usr/bin/date -d '2024-06-15' '+%-D' 06/15/24 $ LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC target/debug/coreutils date -d '2024-06-15' '+%-D' 6/15/24 Test #[test] fn test_date_strftime_flag_on_composite() { new_ucmd!() .env("LC_ALL", "C") .env("TZ", "UTC") .arg("-d") .arg("2024-06-15") .arg("+%-D") .succeeds() .stdout_is("06/15/24\n"); }

📅 Opened Apr 5, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for uutils/coreutils

When evaluating whether to contribute to uutils/coreutils, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of uutils/coreutils acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to uutils/coreutils

01

Is uutils/coreutils welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

uutils/coreutils has a recorded first-timer success rate of 49.5%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.8 places uutils/coreutils in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for uutils/coreutils?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in uutils/coreutils?

Yes, uutils/coreutils currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for uutils/coreutils are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.