utooland/utoo - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A unified toolchain for web development

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 61/100

External PR Merge Rate: 52%

Response Time: 4d

First Timer Success: 54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is utooland/utoo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

utooland/utoo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 53.8%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in utooland/utoo respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 88.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 61.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 61.5 places utooland/utoo in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for utooland/utoo?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for utooland/utoo is 51.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in utooland/utoo?

utooland/utoo currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

utooland
utooland/utooA•Welcoming2.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
utooland

utooland/utoo

2,549
InactiveA•Welcoming(61/100)Rust

A unified toolchain for web development

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
5.0/10
Patience Score
6.0/10
Nitpick Rate
65%

Rigorous architecture standards (100% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in utooland/utoo.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
3 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
51.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
53.8%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
17 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
51.8%
Merge Gauge
53.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe37/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for utooland/utoo
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/utooland/utoo)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/utooland/utoo?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

English Verify whether the optional-dependency Arborist fixtures still need to be skipped. The current code already has optional-failure tolerance in registry resolution, non-registry resolution, package materialization, and lifecycle script execution. Some skip comments in the Arborist runner may now be outdated. Scope Check the fixtures currently listed under optional-transitive skip in e2e/pm-arborist.sh. If they pass, remove them from the skip list. Update e2e/pm/arborist/README.md so the TODO list matches current behavior. Add a lightweight regression note or test if needed. Acceptance Criteria Each optional fixture is either unskipped or has an updated, code-confirmed skip reason. The README no longer claims unsupported behavior that is already implemented. The Arborist runner remains green for the supported fixture set. 中文 验证 Arborist 中 optional dependency 相关 fixture 是否仍然需要 skip。 当前代码已经在 registry 解析、非 registry 解析、包物

📅 Opened Jun 17, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

English Add a lightweight package-lock validation step to the Arborist E2E runner. The current runner mostly checks whether install exits successfully and whether node_modules or package-lock.json exists. We should also verify that generated lockfiles are valid JSON. Scope Update e2e/pm-arborist.sh. After successful install, if package-lock.json exists, validate it with Node.js JSON parsing. Print the fixture name on failure. Keep validation lightweight. Acceptance Criteria Invalid package-lock.json fails the fixture. Valid lockfiles continue to pass. The runner output clearly identifies the failing fixture. 中文 为 Arborist E2E runner 增加轻量级 package-lock.json 校验。 当前 runner 主要检查 install 是否成功,以及 node_modules 或 package-lock.json 是否存在。可以进一步校验生成的 lockfile 是否是合法 JSON。 任务范围 修改 e2e/pm-arborist.sh。 成功安装后,如果存在 package-lock.json,用 Node.js 做 JSON 解析校验。 失

📅 Opened Jun 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

English Expand test coverage for cache-clean matching logic. utoo clean supports package/version patterns, including scoped packages. The matching behavior should be covered more thoroughly. Scope Add tests for regular packages. Add tests for scoped packages like @types/node. Add wildcard matching tests. Verify collected cache entries are sorted deterministically. Acceptance Criteria Scoped and unscoped cache entries are both covered. Wildcard behavior is tested. Sorting behavior is tested. Tests pass. 中文 补充 utoo clean 缓存匹配逻辑的测试覆盖。 utoo clean 支持包名和版本通配,也需要覆盖 scoped package 场景。 任务范围 补充普通包测试。 补充 @types/node 这类 scoped package 测试。 补充通配符匹配测试。 验证收集到的缓存条目排序稳定。 验收标准 普通包和 scoped package 都有测试覆盖。 通配符行为有测试覆盖。 排序行为有测试覆盖。 测试通过。

📅 Opened Jun 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

English Improve test coverage for shell completion generation and shell detection. detect_shell_from_env currently detects common shells from $SHELL. This is a small, well-scoped area for new contributors. Scope Refactor shell-name detection into a small testable helper if needed. Add tests for bash, zsh, and fish. Add tests for unsupported shells. Keep completion generation behavior unchanged. Acceptance Criteria Supported shells are detected correctly. Unsupported shells return None. Completion generation tests still pass. 中文 补强 shell completion 生成与 shell 检测的测试覆盖。 当前 detect_shell_from_env 会从 $SHELL 检测常见 shell。这块逻辑范围小,适合新贡献者上手。 任务范围 如有需要,将 shell 名称检测拆成更容易测试的小函数。 补充 bash、zsh、fish 的测试。 补充不支持 shell 的测试。 不改变 completion 生成行为。 验收标准 支持的 shell 能正确识别。 不支持的 shell 返回 Non

📅 Opened Jun 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

English Add npm-compatible aliases for the uninstall command. Currently utoo supports utoo uninstall and utoo un. Adding remove and rm makes the CLI easier for npm users to discover. Scope Add utoo remove <pkg> alias. Add utoo rm <pkg> alias. Keep existing utoo uninstall and utoo un behavior unchanged. Add CLI parsing tests. Acceptance Criteria utoo remove lodash parses as uninstall. utoo rm lodash parses as uninstall. Existing aliases still work. Tests pass. 中文 为卸载命令增加 npm 兼容别名。 目前 utoo 支持 utoo uninstall 和 utoo un。增加 remove / rm 后,npm 用户更容易上手。 任务范围 增加 utoo remove <pkg> 别名。 增加 utoo rm <pkg> 别名。 保持现有 utoo uninstall 和 utoo un 行为不变。 补充 CLI 解析测试。 验收标准 utoo remove lodash 能解析为卸载命令。 utoo rm lodash 能解析为卸载命令。 现有别名仍然可用。 测试通过。

📅 Opened Jun 17, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for utooland/utoo

When evaluating whether to contribute to utooland/utoo, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of utooland/utoo acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 3 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 51.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to utooland/utoo

01

Is utooland/utoo welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

utooland/utoo has a recorded first-timer success rate of 53.8%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~3 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 61.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 61.5 places utooland/utoo in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for utooland/utoo?

The external pull request merge rate is 51.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in utooland/utoo?

Yes, utooland/utoo currently has 7 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for utooland/utoo are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.