ueberdosis/tiptap - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The headless rich text editor framework for web artisans.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 58%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ueberdosis/tiptap welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ueberdosis/tiptap has a recorded first-timer success rate of 45.5%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ueberdosis/tiptap respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.4 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.4 places ueberdosis/tiptap in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ueberdosis/tiptap?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ueberdosis/tiptap is 58.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ueberdosis/tiptap?

ueberdosis/tiptap currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ueberdosis
ueberdosis/tiptapA•Welcoming38.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ueberdosis

ueberdosis/tiptap

38,670
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(64/100)TypeScript

The headless rich text editor framework for web artisans.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.2/10
Patience Score
6.9/10
Nitpick Rate
49%

Rigorous architecture standards (75% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in ueberdosis/tiptap.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
58.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
45.5%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
54 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
58.0%
Merge Gauge
45.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe37/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ueberdosis/tiptap
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ueberdosis/tiptap)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ueberdosis/tiptap?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Affected Packages @tiptap/markdown Tiptap Version 3.31.4 Browser Used Not browser-specific What happened? Link hrefs parsed from Markdown keep HTML entities undecoded, while the link text is decoded. &amp; in a URL ends up as a literal &amp; in the href attribute. Because the serializer writes & in text as &amp;, this also breaks a plain round trip: typing a bare URL with a query string, saving, and loading again produces a broken link. const editor = new Editor({ extensions: [StarterKit, Markdown] }) editor.commands.setContent('https://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2', { contentType: 'markdown' }) Markdown Link text href https://example.com/?a=1&b=2 https://example.com/?a=1&b=2 https://example.com/?a=1&b=2 https://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2 https://example.com/?a=1&b=2 https://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2 <https://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2> https://example.com/?a=1&b=2 https://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2 [x](https://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2) x https://example.com/?a=1&amp;b=2 Round tr

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Package: @tiptap/extensions 3.31.3 (same code in 3.31.4) Steps to reproduce Configure Placeholder.configure({ includeChildren: true }), with showOnlyCurrent left at its default (true). Put the caret in an empty paragraph at the end of the document and press Enter twice, so there are three empty paragraphs. Press ArrowUp. Expected Only the paragraph that holds the caret shows the placeholder. Actual The paragraph the caret just left keeps its placeholder, so more than one empty paragraph shows it. More placeholders pile up as the caret moves. This did not happen in v2, which rescanned the whole document. Cause includeChildren: true selects the incremental state field (createPlaceholderStateField). After each transaction, collectRescanRanges builds the top-level block ranges to rescan from resolveTopLevelRange, then passes them through toContentRelativeRange: function toContentRelativeRange(doc, range) { return { from: Math.max(0, range.from - 1), to: Math.min(doc.content.siz

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Affected Packages extension-mention, markdown Tiptap Version 3.30.3 Browser Used Not browser-specific What happened? When a mention label contains a double quote, saving to Markdown and loading it again cuts the label off. The text after the quote is lost without any error. The mention is written as label="..." with the value put in as is, and the parser stops at the first closing ". Repro with MarkdownManager and the Mention extension (vitest, no editor needed). Serialize this doc: { type: 'doc', content: [{ type: 'paragraph', content: [{ type: 'mention', attrs: { id: 'u1', label: 'Bob "The Builder" Smith' } }] }] } Output of serialize: [@ id="u1" label="Bob "The Builder" Smith"] parse of that output gives the attrs { id: 'u1', label: 'Bob ' }. Other results: label a"b comes back as a label O'Brien is fine Found on main (13675ea), @tiptap/extension-mention 3.30.3. AI disclosure: I found this with Claude's help and confirmed it by running the repro above. I would like to send a small

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Affected Packages suggestion Tiptap Version 3.30.3 Browser Used Not browser-specific What happened? findSuggestionMatch builds a regular expression from allowedPrefixes without escaping the entries: new RegExp(`^[${allowedPrefixes?.join('')}\0]?$`) So any prefix that is special inside a character class breaks the match. allowedPrefixes: [' ', '-'] throws: Invalid regular expression: /^[ - ]?$/: Range out of order in character class allowedPrefixes: [' ', ']'] never matches, so the suggestion never opens after ] a backslash and ^ are also read as regex syntax ['-', ' '] happens to work, so the result depends on the order of the array Small repro (plain ProseMirror schema, no editor needed). Doc is "hi @bob", cursor at the end: findSuggestionMatch({ char: '@', allowSpaces: false, allowToIncludeChar: false, allowedPrefixes: [' ', '-'], startOfLine: false, $position }) With [' '] it returns { range: { from: 4, to: 8 }, query: 'bob' }. With [' ', '-'] it throws. Found on main (13675ea), @

📅 Opened Oct 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 85/100Contribute

Affected Packages @tiptap/extension-list, @tiptap/markdown Tiptap Version 3.31.3 Browser Used All (reproduced in Chromium and in Node with happy-dom) What happened? When Markdown with a fenced code block inside an ordered list item is parsed, each code line gets one extra leading space. The error grows with every round-trip: getMarkdown() writes the extra space back, and the next setContent(..., { contentType: "markdown" }) adds one more. Saving the same document 3 times gives 4 extra spaces. const input = "1. Item:\n\n ```\n code line\n ```\n"; const editor = new Editor({ extensions: [StarterKit, Markdown], content: input, contentType: "markdown" }); // code block text: " code line" (CommonMark reference: "code line") editor.commands.setContent(editor.getMarkdown(), { contentType: "markdown" }); // " code line" editor.commands.setContent(editor.getMarkdown(), { contentType: "markdown" }); // " code line" The same happens with 10. markers. Expected Behavior The code block t

📅 Opened Sep 28, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 60/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ueberdosis/tiptap

When evaluating whether to contribute to ueberdosis/tiptap, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ueberdosis/tiptap acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 58.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ueberdosis/tiptap

01

Is ueberdosis/tiptap welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ueberdosis/tiptap has a recorded first-timer success rate of 45.5%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.4 places ueberdosis/tiptap in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ueberdosis/tiptap?

The external pull request merge rate is 58.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ueberdosis/tiptap?

Yes, ueberdosis/tiptap currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ueberdosis/tiptap are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.