typelevel/cats-effect - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The pure asynchronous runtime for Scala

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 59/100

External PR Merge Rate: 62%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is typelevel/cats-effect welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

typelevel/cats-effect has a recorded first-timer success rate of 40.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in typelevel/cats-effect respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 59.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 59.2 places typelevel/cats-effect in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for typelevel/cats-effect?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for typelevel/cats-effect is 61.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in typelevel/cats-effect?

typelevel/cats-effect currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

typelevel
typelevel/cats-effectA•Welcoming2.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
typelevel

typelevel/cats-effect

2,244
InactiveA•Welcoming(59/100)Scala

The pure asynchronous runtime for Scala

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in typelevel/cats-effect. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
61.8%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
40.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
22 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
61.8%
Merge Gauge
40.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe37/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for typelevel/cats-effect
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/typelevel/cats-effect)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/typelevel/cats-effect?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Some of the docs mention "semantic blocking" and some "fiber blocking". In https://typelevel.org/cats-effect/docs/thread-model we mention "Fiber blocking (previously "Semantic Blocking")". So likely we should review and change all instances of "semantic blocking" to "fiber blocking".

📅 Opened May 5, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute
Looking for more Scala beginner tasks?Explore Scala GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for typelevel/cats-effect

When evaluating whether to contribute to typelevel/cats-effect, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of typelevel/cats-effect acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 61.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to typelevel/cats-effect

01

Is typelevel/cats-effect welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

typelevel/cats-effect has a recorded first-timer success rate of 40.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 59.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 59.2 places typelevel/cats-effect in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for typelevel/cats-effect?

The external pull request merge rate is 61.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in typelevel/cats-effect?

Yes, typelevel/cats-effect currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for typelevel/cats-effect are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.