twinksoftware/Gearslip - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

An Android Auto alternative built for everyone

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 55/100

External PR Merge Rate: 63%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is twinksoftware/Gearslip welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

twinksoftware/Gearslip has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in twinksoftware/Gearslip respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 55.4 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 55.4 places twinksoftware/Gearslip in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for twinksoftware/Gearslip?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for twinksoftware/Gearslip is 62.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in twinksoftware/Gearslip?

twinksoftware/Gearslip currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

twinksoftware
twinksoftware/GearslipB•Solid120
GitHub
Back to Explorer
twinksoftware

twinksoftware/Gearslip

120
Active (30d)B•Solid(55/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Capped at B (Bus Factor: 1)Kotlin

An Android Auto alternative built for everyone

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in twinksoftware/Gearslip. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in twinksoftware/Gearslip focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
62.5%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CAPS TIER AT B
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
62.5%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe69/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for twinksoftware/Gearslip
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/twinksoftware/Gearslip)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/twinksoftware/Gearslip?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Hey Seb, I have not tried it yet, but wanted to ask a question based on the thread in the Vela github. In the tread ir was mentioned that this only works with cars that use wired android auto. Is this a limitation on the version that was used to rework the logic? Or is there encryption happening on the wireless Version? Many thanks and will try the implementation very son when I hwt the chance. EDIT: Just read the README. So the limitation is because of the file that newer head units reject right? Is the leaked file included in the release or do we need to build it ourselfs?

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 21 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Kotlin beginner tasks?Explore Kotlin GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for twinksoftware/Gearslip

When evaluating whether to contribute to twinksoftware/Gearslip, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of twinksoftware/Gearslip acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 62.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to twinksoftware/Gearslip

01

Is twinksoftware/Gearslip welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

twinksoftware/Gearslip has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 55.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 55.4 places twinksoftware/Gearslip in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for twinksoftware/Gearslip?

The external pull request merge rate is 62.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in twinksoftware/Gearslip?

Yes, twinksoftware/Gearslip currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for twinksoftware/Gearslip are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.