tone-3000/tone3000-plugin - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

TONE3000 plugin

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 72/100

External PR Merge Rate: 74%

Response Time: 2h

First Timer Success: 60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is tone-3000/tone3000-plugin welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

tone-3000/tone3000-plugin has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in tone-3000/tone3000-plugin respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 1.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 71.8 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 71.8 places tone-3000/tone3000-plugin in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for tone-3000/tone3000-plugin?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for tone-3000/tone3000-plugin is 74.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in tone-3000/tone3000-plugin?

tone-3000/tone3000-plugin does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

tone-3000
tone-3000/tone3000-pluginS•Elite237
GitHub
Back to Explorer
tone-3000

tone-3000/tone3000-plugin

237
Active (30d)S•Elite(72/100)C++

TONE3000 plugin

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in tone-3000/tone3000-plugin. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in tone-3000/tone3000-plugin focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not open context-free PRs
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
74.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
32 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
74.0%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe76/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for tone-3000/tone3000-plugin
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/tone-3000/tone3000-plugin)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/tone-3000/tone3000-plugin?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Search I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate Problem Problem Related to #82, but a distinct trigger: adding a new block (tapping the + insert slot) or swapping an existing block's tone also resets the chain view's horizontal scroll position to the far left, instead of scrolling to or landing on the block that was just added/swapped. On a long chain, this means every add or swap forces the same manual scroll-back that #82 describes for closing an expanded block view — but it isn't covered by that fix, since it's a different part of the UI losing track of where you were. Proposal When a block is added or swapped in, bring it into view automatically — ideally by opening its expanded view directly (matching what tapping an existing tile already does), or at minimum by centering its tile in the gallery. Either way, the viewport shouldn't default back to the start of the chain. Alternatives None needed — this should follow the same "land on what you just did" behavi

📅 Opened Sep 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Search I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate Problem When reopening a NAM model/IR dropdown menu, the list always defaults to the very top instead of jumping to and highlighting the currently loaded file. In folders or tone packs containing dozens or hundreds of files, this causes significant friction: the user loses visual context of what is active and is forced to scroll all the way back down to find neighboring files. Proposal When opening a dropdown menu: Automatically scroll the list view so the currently active item is visible in the viewport. Clearly highlight/check the active item in the list. Alternatives No response Area Interface

📅 Opened Sep 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Search I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate Problem When closing an expanded block view to return to the main signal chain, the horizontal viewport automatically resets and snaps to the far left (the start of the chain). On longer chains, this is disorienting and forces the user to manually scroll back each time to find where they were working. Proposal Preserve the horizontal scroll position of the chain. When exiting an expanded block view, the view should remain at the current position, preferably keeping the recently edited block centered or visible in the viewport. Alternatives None needed — maintaining scroll/viewport state on navigation stack pop is standard UI behavior. Area Interface

📅 Opened Sep 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Search I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate Problem Summary / Context Currently, the built-in EQ within processing blocks exhibits the following signal routing behavior: Default (Post): The EQ processes the entire output of the block affecting both the Wet and Dry signals combined. Pre mode: The EQ filters the signal prior to processing (effectively targeting only the path entering the block's algorithm, leaving the parallel dry intact). The Problem Filtering both the wet and dry paths combined in the default/post position is unintuitive and counter-productive for parallel processing workflows. In typical audio and plugin architectures, an internal block EQ is expected to shape the processed (wet) sound only, preserving the integrity and tone of the direct (dry) signal. Practical Use Case Reverb / Delay / IR Loading: When running a space IR, reverb, or delay block with a parallel mix (e.g., 30% Wet / 70% Dry), the user almost always wants to filter out harsh hig

📅 Opened Sep 6, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for tone-3000/tone3000-plugin

When evaluating whether to contribute to tone-3000/tone3000-plugin, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of tone-3000/tone3000-plugin acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 74.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to tone-3000/tone3000-plugin

01

Is tone-3000/tone3000-plugin welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

tone-3000/tone3000-plugin has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 71.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 71.8 places tone-3000/tone3000-plugin in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for tone-3000/tone3000-plugin?

The external pull request merge rate is 74.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in tone-3000/tone3000-plugin?

tone-3000/tone3000-plugin does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for tone-3000/tone3000-plugin are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.