tobychui/zoraxy - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A general purpose HTTP reverse proxy and forwarding tool. Now written in Go!

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 56/100

External PR Merge Rate: 68%

Response Time: 11h

First Timer Success: 60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is tobychui/zoraxy welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

tobychui/zoraxy has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in tobychui/zoraxy respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 11.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 56.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 56.2 places tobychui/zoraxy in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for tobychui/zoraxy?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for tobychui/zoraxy is 68.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in tobychui/zoraxy?

tobychui/zoraxy currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

tobychui
tobychui/zoraxyAWelcoming5.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
tobychui

tobychui/zoraxy

5,389
AWelcoming(56/100)HTML

A general purpose HTTP reverse proxy and forwarding tool. Now written in Go!

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
11 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
68.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
60.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
68.0%
Merge Gauge
60.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe67/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for tobychui/zoraxy
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/tobychui/zoraxy)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/tobychui/zoraxy?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

What happened? Hello ! I am trying to setup a header authentication mechanism for my music service Navidrome coupled with Pocket ID. The OIDC login works but the userid is not properly catched afterwards. Describe what have you tried Here is what I have as config : Security --> SSO/OAUTH2 : I have setup the client id & secret, as well as the .well-known URL (https://pocket.mydomain.be/.well-known/openid-configuration) On the navidrome host definition --> Security : Authentication Provider --> OAUTH2 Headers --> custom headers : Zoraxy >> origin with key X-Auth-User & value... well that's the issue. If I put plainly franky which is a defined user in navidrome, it works. But ! If I put something like username, $username, {username}, ${username}, ... it will login to navidrome and create a userid with username, $username, {username} or ${username}, but not with franky. So I believe something is missing here, I can't figure out how to give the proper OIDC response from pocket into a dyna

📅 Opened Apr 15, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

What happened? Navigating to 10.10.100.223:9091 loads the transmission web UI just fine. However, attempting to access the service through Zoraxy consistently fails with an error 521. This is after fixing the firewall rules that caused my problems last time. Describe what have you tried I have tried basically every option Zoraxy has. Describe the networking setup you are using Here are some example, commonly asked questions from our maintainers: Non-Docker Zoraxy V3.3.2 No CloudFlare 10.10.120.2 for the proxy server and 10.10.100.0/24 for everything else. Firewall rules allow direct connections from the proxy. I have a record transmission.internal that points to 10.10.100.223. So Zoraxy sees transmission.internal:9091 as its upstream. Additional context When loading the page directly, there are a number of fairly immediate redirects to /transmission/rpc and /transmission/web. These may be interfering. I'd like to know where I can activate more verbose logging on the Zoraxy side that

📅 Opened Apr 3, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

What happened? I have added a custom 521 error page in the root dir of the server [www], named 521.html, but the error page is not being displayed/applied. Any help or correct procedure will be appreciated.

📅 Opened Mar 30, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 55/100Contribute

What happened? I am running a domain that hosts multiple web applications under different subdomains. Some of these applications are published internally only, while others are published both internally and externally. For external publishing, I am using Cloudflare together with a cloudflared Tunnel in proxy mode. The cloudflared tunnel connects back into my local network via the loopback interface, where it forwards all traffic to Zoraxy using a wildcard redirect. As an additional security layer for externally exposed subdomains, I am using oauth2-proxy with Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) as the identity provider. To differentiate between internal and external access, I am using a hairpin DNS approach: Internal clients resolve the subdomains to the internal network interface of Zoraxy and access the applications directly without Cloudflare. External clients resolve the same subdomains via public DNS, go through Cloudflare, enter via the cloudflared tunnel, and then reach Zoraxy over th

📅 Opened Feb 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

What happened? I am attempting to configure NetBird but getting 400/404s on some of the virtual directory endpoints Describe what have you tried Using h2c:// for gRPC endpoints, port numbers, trailing slashes Describe the networking setup you are using Here are some example, commonly asked questions from our maintainers: Docker compose: services: zoraxy-docker: image: zoraxydocker/zoraxy:latest container_name: zoraxy ports: - 80:80 - 443:443 networks: [main] volumes: - ./config:/opt/zoraxy/config/ environment: ARGS: '-noauth=false' networks: main: external: true Zoraxy version: 3.3.1 Cloudflare: no No NAT DNS: *.domain.tld and domain.tld point to public IP of server. Additional context I found a GitHub issue where someone had a working config, but I wasn't able to replicate it. NetBird shouldn't need any extra certificates like the person in the issue described. The issue is also a bit old, so Zoraxy / NetBird might have chan

📅 Opened Feb 3, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more HTML beginner tasks?Explore HTML GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for tobychui/zoraxy

When evaluating whether to contribute to tobychui/zoraxy, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of tobychui/zoraxy acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 11 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 68.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to tobychui/zoraxy

01

Is tobychui/zoraxy welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

tobychui/zoraxy has a recorded first-timer success rate of 60.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~11 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 56.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 56.2 places tobychui/zoraxy in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for tobychui/zoraxy?

The external pull request merge rate is 68.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in tobychui/zoraxy?

Yes, tobychui/zoraxy currently has 10 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for tobychui/zoraxy are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.