thunder-id/thunderid - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

ThunderID is a high-performance, open-source identity stack designed for developers to secure and manage access for humans, AI agents, and machines through fully composable identity flows.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 74/100

External PR Merge Rate: 84%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is thunder-id/thunderid welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

thunder-id/thunderid has a recorded first-timer success rate of 74.2%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in thunder-id/thunderid respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 37.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 74.3 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 74.3 places thunder-id/thunderid in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for thunder-id/thunderid?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for thunder-id/thunderid is 84.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in thunder-id/thunderid?

thunder-id/thunderid currently has 36 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

thunder-id
thunder-id/thunderidS•Elite586
GitHub
Back to Explorer
thunder-id

thunder-id/thunderid

586
Active (30d)S•Elite(74/100)Go

ThunderID is a high-performance, open-source identity stack designed for developers to secure and manage access for humans, AI agents, and machines through fully composable identity flows.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in thunder-id/thunderid. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
84.3%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
74.2%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
55 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
84.3%
Merge Gauge
74.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe58/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for thunder-id/thunderid
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/thunder-id/thunderid)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/thunder-id/thunderid?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Current Limitation Currently backend/internal/system/http exposes four constructors and each one bundles a fixed combination of timeout, redirect policy and SSRF dial guard. However this has the following concerns. The dial guard isn't selectable. It only comes with NewHTTPClientWithCheckRedirect, so a caller gets it as a side effect of wanting a redirect policy. The OAuth authenticator dials the token and userinfo endpoints from the connection config with an unguarded client, while the JWKS resolver is guarded. Same kind of URL, different treatment. Every new combination needs another constructor. A general method taking the options positionally doesn't help either, since the next option changes the signature again. The HTTPClient struct is exported although nothing outside the package uses it. Suggested Improvement The idea is to take a config struct, so a new option is a new field and existing callers don't change. // HTTPClientConfig carries the options for an outbound HTTP clien

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Current Limitation Two related gaps make it awkward to add a phone number attribute to a user type schema. 1. There is no phone number attribute in the schema attribute library. When building a user type schema in the Console, users pick from a predefined library of attributes defined in frontend/packages/configure-user-types/src/constants/attributes.ts. That list has 32 entries but none of them is a phone number, so a user who wants one has to add a fully custom property by hand. The omission looks like an oversight rather than a deliberate choice, because the library already contains phone_verified (attributes.ts:204) with the display name "Phone Verified". There is a flag to mark a phone number as verified, but no phone number attribute to go with it. The equivalent email pair is complete: both email and email_verified are present. The built-in Person user type does define mobile_number, which is what makes its absence from the library surprising to users comparing the two. 2. The b

📅 Opened Sep 8, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 65/100Contribute

Document issue type Type/Bug (Report inaccuracies, outdated information, or missing details in the existing content) Description md ### Writing Tests A flow is a YAML file: a header naming the app under test, then a list of commands after the `---` separator. Bug When the Code UI overflows, the UI looks buggy. Version 1.0.0

📅 Opened Sep 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Description OAuth 2.0 Security BCP (§4.1.3) requires that authorization servers MUST NOT allow redirect URIs using the http scheme, except for native clients using loopback interface redirection (RFC 8252 §7.3). ThunderID currently accepts http redirect URIs for any host. Registration validation in validateRedirectURIs (backend/internal/inboundclient/service.go) checks structure only (non-empty scheme, host present for web schemes, no fragment, wildcard rules) and never inspects the scheme; DCR reuses the same path. At authorization time, ValidateRedirectURI (backend/pkg/thunderidengine/providers/oauth_client.go) only pattern-matches against the registered list. There is no server config option to restrict this. The only acknowledgement is in backend/internal/oauth/oauth2/authz/service.go, which sets a showInsecureWarning query param on the login redirect when the scheme is http. That is advisory rather than blocking, and the param is unused, the only other occurrence in the repo is

📅 Opened Aug 22, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Summary The consent attribute-profile filter does not distinguish between unavailable profile data and a known empty user profile. buildAttributePurposePrompt currently filters an attribute only when len(userAttributeSet) > 0. In Go, a nil map and an empty map both have length zero. As a result, when the identity provider returns a known empty attribute set, the consent flow disables profile filtering and can prompt for requested attributes that are not present for the user. Required change Define and implement the intended profile-filter contract in the default consent service: If profile data is available and contains no applicable attributes, do not create an attribute consent prompt. Preserve the behavior for profile formats that do not expose individual attribute names, if that behavior remains required. Distinguish an unavailable or opaque profile from a known empty profile. Add focused tests for nil, empty, opaque JWT/JWE, and populated attribute responses. Affected area back

📅 Opened Aug 19, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for thunder-id/thunderid

When evaluating whether to contribute to thunder-id/thunderid, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of thunder-id/thunderid acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 84.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to thunder-id/thunderid

01

Is thunder-id/thunderid welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

thunder-id/thunderid has a recorded first-timer success rate of 74.2%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 74.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 74.3 places thunder-id/thunderid in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for thunder-id/thunderid?

The external pull request merge rate is 84.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in thunder-id/thunderid?

Yes, thunder-id/thunderid currently has 36 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for thunder-id/thunderid are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.