the-open-engine/zeroshot - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Runs coding agents as a graph: one agent implements, independent agents review, failures go to repair, and nothing ships until the checks pass. Works with Codex, Claude Code and Copilot. Bring your own topology.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 81%

Response Time: 4d

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the-open-engine/zeroshot welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

the-open-engine/zeroshot has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in the-open-engine/zeroshot respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 107.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 69.0 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 69.0 places the-open-engine/zeroshot in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for the-open-engine/zeroshot?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for the-open-engine/zeroshot is 81.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in the-open-engine/zeroshot?

the-open-engine/zeroshot currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

the-open-engine
the-open-engine/zeroshotA•Welcoming1.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
the-open-engine

the-open-engine/zeroshot

1,943
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(69/100)Rust

Runs coding agents as a graph: one agent implements, independent agents review, failures go to repair, and nothing ships until the checks pass. Works with Codex, Claude Code and Copilot. Bring your own topology.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active JavaScript repository in the-open-engine/zeroshot with ongoing community development and issue triage.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with JavaScript style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
4 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
81.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
7 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
81.5%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe48/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for the-open-engine/zeroshot
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/the-open-engine/zeroshot)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/the-open-engine/zeroshot?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Description Each agent gets its own TMPDIR like ~/.local/state/zeroshot/runs/<uuid>/runtime/execution-18/tmp, already about 100 characters. Go's t.TempDir() appends the test name plus a random number, and a socket name on top of that lands around 170 characters. Linux limits a Unix socket path to 108 bytes, so bind() fails with invalid argument and every test that creates a socket in a temp dir fails for the directory name alone. Expected A short per-run TMPDIR, for example under /tmp/zs-<short-id>/, or a documented override, so socket-based tests behave as they do outside Zeroshot. Reported in the community Discord (#feedback); filed here so it can be claimed. Reporter: Torstein.

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description A reviewer wanted to know whether failing tests also failed on the base revision. It stashed the working tree and checked out the base revision over it inside the worktree, which discarded the worker's changes. The following review-repair node then started from a worktree missing most of the previous work. Expected Reviewer nodes should not be able to destroy the candidate change. Either run them against a read-only snapshot, give them a separate checkout for base comparisons, or block destructive Git commands in review roles. Reported in the community Discord (#feedback); filed here so it can be claimed. Reporter: Torstein.

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem Supported harnesses are Codex, Claude Code and Copilot. Users on OpenCode or pi cannot run Zeroshot with the agent they already use. Proposal Add harness adapters for OpenCode and pi. Earlier OpenCode support existed in the Node-era product (#390, #530) and does not carry over. Reported in the community Discord (#feedback); filed here so it can be claimed. Reporter: Andrey, who offered to contribute.

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem Running on a VPS under Tailscale, the latest release explicitly forbids binding to anything but the loopback address, so the UI and API can only be reached through an extra tunnel. Proposal Allow an explicit opt-in bind address, for example a Tailscale interface, with the existing authentication still required. Reported in the community Discord (#feedback); filed here so it can be claimed. Reporter: Andrey.

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description About four hours into a long run, five verifiers started in parallel and all got 400 Grammar compilation rate limit exceeded. You can try again later. from the Copilot API. Each retried immediately (attempt 2), hit the same limit within seconds, and the run ended review_failed. The same nodes had passed two rounds earlier. Probable trigger: every session.send uses responseFormat: json_schema, strict: true, so each session costs the backend a grammar compilation. Expected Rate-limit responses are retried with backoff, ideally staggered across parallel nodes, rather than counted as a review failure. Reported in the community Discord (#feedback); filed here so it can be claimed. Reporter: Torstein.

📅 Opened Oct 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for the-open-engine/zeroshot

When evaluating whether to contribute to the-open-engine/zeroshot, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of the-open-engine/zeroshot acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 4 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 81.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to the-open-engine/zeroshot

01

Is the-open-engine/zeroshot welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

the-open-engine/zeroshot has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~4 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 69.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 69.0 places the-open-engine/zeroshot in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for the-open-engine/zeroshot?

The external pull request merge rate is 81.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in the-open-engine/zeroshot?

Yes, the-open-engine/zeroshot currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for the-open-engine/zeroshot are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.