terrakube-io/terrakube - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Open source IaC Automation and Collaboration Software.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 73/100

External PR Merge Rate: 86%

Response Time: 22h

First Timer Success: 56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is terrakube-io/terrakube welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

terrakube-io/terrakube has a recorded first-timer success rate of 56.3%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in terrakube-io/terrakube respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 22.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 73.2 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 73.2 places terrakube-io/terrakube in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for terrakube-io/terrakube?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for terrakube-io/terrakube is 86.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in terrakube-io/terrakube?

terrakube-io/terrakube currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

terrakube-io
terrakube-io/terrakubeSElite946
GitHub
Back to Explorer
terrakube-io

terrakube-io/terrakube

946
SElite(73/100)Java

Open source IaC Automation and Collaboration Software.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
9.2/10
Patience Score
9.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in terrakube-io/terrakube. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
22 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
86.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
56.3%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
21 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
86.2%
Merge Gauge
56.3%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe65/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for terrakube-io/terrakube
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/terrakube-io/terrakube)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/terrakube-io/terrakube?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Bug description 🐞 The provider trust_signature is limited to 32 characaters. Terraform init then fails to armor-decode when verifying the signature and terraform init aborts: Error: Failed to install provider Error while installing registry.example.com/myorg/coderd v0.0.22: error verifying trust signature: unexpected EOF This only affects providers whose upstream registry metadata actually populates trust_signature. In our registry, 15 of 16 mirrored providers store '' and work fine; only coder/coderd publishes a trust signature and fails to verify. Steps to reproduce Import a provider whose upstream metadata sets signing_keys.gpg_public_keys[].trust_signature — e.g. coder/coderd. GET /terraform/providers/v1/{ns}/coderd/0.0.22/download/linux/amd64 → trust_signature is 32 chars. terraform init with that provider → error verifying trust signature: unexpected EOF. Expected behavior Full trust_signature to be stored and successful terraform init. Example repository terraform {

📅 Opened Aug 18, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Feature description 💡 Currently, UI shows who triggered the Job run. It would be nice to display additional information like VCS workspace UI run example Run Triggered at/by: Timestamp by USER Source: repo name Commit: Branch name [commit id] Trigger: VCS via UI using template Plan/Apply Run reason: commit id message Job type: Plan or Plan and Apply Executed on Agent: <Agent name/ Ephemeral k8 pod name/ip> VCS workspace CLI run example Run Triggered at/by: Timestamp by USER Source: CLI Trigger: CLI using template Plan/Apply Run reason: No reason Job type: Plan or Plan and Apply Executed on Agent: <Agent name/ Ephemeral k8 pod name/ip> Anything else? No response

📅 Opened Feb 24, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Bug description 🐞 We are currently testing terrakube, and we use a self-hosted gitlab instance. I have configured workspaces using git ssh as the source without using the gitlab integration. The formatSshUrl function in the Terrakube UI fails to properly convert SSH URLs to HTTPS for self-hosted GitLab/GitHub/Bitbucket instances. It only handles hardcoded domains (github.com, gitlab.com, bitbucket.org), leaving the colon in SSH URLs unconverted for any other domain. Version Affected Terrakube 2.28.0 (UI component) Root Cause In the minified UI bundle, there are two similar functions: fixSshURL (correct implementation): i.replace(":", "/").replace("git@", "https://") This correctly handles any SSH URL by: First replacing : with / Then replacing git@ with https:// formatSshUrl (buggy implementation): // Only handles specific domains: i.includes("github.com") && (i = i.replace(".com:", ".com/")) i.includes("gitlab.com") && (i = i.replace(".com:", ".com/")) i.includes("bitbucket.org")

📅 Opened Feb 5, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Feature description 💡 Currently, the plan and apply outputs are pretty verbose as Terraform shows all the init and resource sync. It would be great to at least split in two dropable frames, one with the init and the other can be the plan/apply. This way expanding will only show more usefull data. If it can be possible to hide even more the resource scanning inside the plan, it will improve the information being shown. By using different drop down frames, debugging can be performed if intended. Anything else? It's great that Terrakube shows all the information related to each run. It's very appreaciated at debug time, but for regular operation, we might make that information less visible.

📅 Opened Jan 30, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Feature description 💡 Hello we are testing terrakube using Qumulo as S3 backend. Qumulo need as region us-east-1 but Terrakube creates header Authorization with path that indicates "auto" as region. I've modified S3Client builder from '.region(Region.of("auto"))' to '.region(Region.US_EAST_1)'. I've also added '.chunkedEncodingEnabled(false)' and '.checksumValidationEnabled(false)' in the S3Configuration builder as it seems that Qumulo doesn't support chunks. With these changes I've been able to store state on Qumulo. I was wondering if it is possible to create parameters for those two settings, better if it is possible to also add as helm variables. Thanks Bye Anything else? No response

📅 Opened Dec 28, 2025💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for terrakube-io/terrakube

When evaluating whether to contribute to terrakube-io/terrakube, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of terrakube-io/terrakube acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 22 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 86.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to terrakube-io/terrakube

01

Is terrakube-io/terrakube welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

terrakube-io/terrakube has a recorded first-timer success rate of 56.3%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~22 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 73.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 73.2 places terrakube-io/terrakube in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for terrakube-io/terrakube?

The external pull request merge rate is 86.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in terrakube-io/terrakube?

Yes, terrakube-io/terrakube currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for terrakube-io/terrakube are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.

terrakube-io/terrakube (S-Tier 73.2) • 86% Merge | GM