temporalio/cli - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Command-line interface for running Temporal Server and interacting with Workflows, Activities, Namespaces, and other parts of Temporal

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 69%

Response Time: 13h

First Timer Success: 63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is temporalio/cli welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

temporalio/cli has a recorded first-timer success rate of 63.2%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in temporalio/cli respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 13.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 62.8 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 62.8 places temporalio/cli in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for temporalio/cli?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for temporalio/cli is 69.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in temporalio/cli?

temporalio/cli currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

temporalio
temporalio/cliA•Welcoming378
GitHub
Back to Explorer
temporalio

temporalio/cli

378
InactiveA•Welcoming(63/100)Go

Command-line interface for running Temporal Server and interacting with Workflows, Activities, Namespaces, and other parts of Temporal

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.2/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Highly welcoming maintainers in temporalio/cli. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
13 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
69.2%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
63.2%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
29 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
69.2%
Merge Gauge
63.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe67/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for temporalio/cli
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/temporalio/cli)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/temporalio/cli?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. We are too assumptive about JSON usage everywhere...We need to support arbitrary encodings for at least inputs (if not outputs also...) , for example encoding=json/protobuf. We support this on some commands while others we do not. Describe the solution you'd like Support protobufs for real from the CLI since we include it as default data converter in most SDKs OOTB. We really should allow specifying the OUTPUT encoding too since protobufs are a result too, not just an input. Basically, these commands need to be consistency and real-world. Additional context I did the hard part for you in identifying which commands lack proper support for input encoding: Category Command Payload Flag Meta/Encoding Switch? Workflow start / execute --input Yes (--input-meta) Workflow update start --input Yes (--input-meta) Workflow signal --input No Workflow query --input No Activity complete --result No Activity fail --detail

📅 Opened Feb 26, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Describe the bug Fetching workflow update result via temporal workflow update execute or temporal workflow update result with -o json yields output that is incorrect in two ways: If there is the update failed with an error, no error JSON is produced. If the update succeeds, the JSON does not include full result payload details when using the --no-json-shorthand-payloads option (it is effectively silently ignored). Minimal Reproduction Failed update Start this workflow @workflow.defn class WorkflowWithUpdate: @workflow.run async def run(self) -> None: await asyncio.Future() @workflow.update async def update(self) -> str: raise ApplicationError("error in update") temporal workflow start --type WorkflowWithUpdate --task-queue demo Now try to fetch an update result. The CLI outputs an error message but no JSON error info. It should output detailed structured error chain info including stack traces: $ temporal workflow -o json update execute --workflow-id

📅 Opened Feb 25, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for temporalio/cli

When evaluating whether to contribute to temporalio/cli, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of temporalio/cli acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 13 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 69.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to temporalio/cli

01

Is temporalio/cli welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

temporalio/cli has a recorded first-timer success rate of 63.2%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~13 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 62.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 62.8 places temporalio/cli in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for temporalio/cli?

The external pull request merge rate is 69.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in temporalio/cli?

Yes, temporalio/cli currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for temporalio/cli are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.