tauri-apps/tauri - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Build smaller, faster, and more secure desktop and mobile applications with a web frontend.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 51%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is tauri-apps/tauri welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

tauri-apps/tauri has a recorded first-timer success rate of 34.5%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in tauri-apps/tauri respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 63.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 63.1 places tauri-apps/tauri in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for tauri-apps/tauri?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for tauri-apps/tauri is 51.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in tauri-apps/tauri?

tauri-apps/tauri currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

tauri-apps
tauri-apps/tauriA•Welcoming111.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
tauri-apps

tauri-apps/tauri

111,870
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(63/100)Rust

Build smaller, faster, and more secure desktop and mobile applications with a web frontend.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.6/10
Patience Score
7.2/10
Nitpick Rate
43%

Rigorous architecture standards (66% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in tauri-apps/tauri.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
51.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
34.5%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
82 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
51.3%
Merge Gauge
34.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe31/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for tauri-apps/tauri
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/tauri-apps/tauri)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/tauri-apps/tauri?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Describe the bug A Windows WebView2 custom protocol request can call Tauri's custom protocol handler from a non-main thread. If the handler path looks up and clones a Webview, this can clone tauri_runtime_wry::DispatcherMainThreadContext off the main thread and trip the unsafe Rc precondition inside tao::EventLoopWindowTarget. In our app this was observed as an unsafe precondition violation around Rc::inc_strong / strong_count == 0 while cloning a Tauri webview during custom protocol handling. The suspected chain is: text Tauri::Webview::clone -> DetachedWebview::clone -> WryWebviewDispatcher::clone -> Context::clone -> DispatcherMainThreadContext::clone -> EventLoopWindowTarget::clone -> Rc<EventLoopRunner>::clone DispatcherMainThreadContext has unsafe Send / Sync impls with the safety comment saying the type is only used on the main thread, but the derived Clone can still be reached from non-main-thread custom protocol callbacks. Source locations checked This is still present in the

📅 Opened May 18, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Describe the bug When typing Arabic or Hebrew text (RTL languages) in a contenteditable element or rich text editor (TipTap), the page scroll jumps on every keystroke when the text contains spaces (triggering word wrap). This issue only occurs in the Tauri desktop app (macOS WebView), not in standard web browsers (Chrome, Safari, Firefox). The scroll jump makes the app completely unusable for Arabic/Hebrew-speaking users as the page jumps unpredictably while typing. The issue specifically occurs when: ✅ Text is RTL (Arabic/Hebrew characters) ✅ AND text contains spaces (triggers word wrap) ✅ AND running in Tauri desktop app (WebView) Does NOT occur when: ❌ Typing English text (LTR) ❌ Typing Arabic text WITHOUT spaces (no word wrap) ❌ Running the same code in regular web browsers Reproduction Steps: Create a Tauri app with a scrollable page container Add a TipTap editor (or any contenteditable element) to the page Scroll the page down so there's scroll offset Focus the e

📅 Opened May 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for tauri-apps/tauri

When evaluating whether to contribute to tauri-apps/tauri, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of tauri-apps/tauri acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 51.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to tauri-apps/tauri

01

Is tauri-apps/tauri welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

tauri-apps/tauri has a recorded first-timer success rate of 34.5%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 63.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 63.1 places tauri-apps/tauri in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for tauri-apps/tauri?

The external pull request merge rate is 51.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in tauri-apps/tauri?

Yes, tauri-apps/tauri currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for tauri-apps/tauri are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.