swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Language Server Protocol implementation for Swift and C-based languages

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 72%

Response Time: 23h

First Timer Success: 62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 61.9%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 22.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.2 places swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp is 71.7%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp?

swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

swiftlang
swiftlang/sourcekit-lspAWelcoming3.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
swiftlang

swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp

3,903
AWelcoming(58/100)Swift

Language Server Protocol implementation for Swift and C-based languages

Compare
Jump to:
Response Velocity
22 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
71.7%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
61.9%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
30 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
71.7%
Merge Gauge
61.9%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe60/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Currently, many of the code actions in SwiftLanguageService/CodeActions directly conform to SyntaxCodeActionProvider. For those for which it makes sense, I think we could avoid some boilerplate (and add some more structure) by making the code action conform to SyntaxRefactoringCodeActionProvider as well as SyntaxRefactoringCodeActionProvider, removing the explicit implementation of codeActions(in:) and instead rely on the synthesized version. As this is a learning-oriented task, please don’t address this purely by using an AI tool, as described in https://github.com/swiftlang/project-operations/blob/main/contributing/ai-tools.md#learning-oriented-contributions.

📅 Opened Apr 29, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Description Toggle a test between enabled and disabled states. Swift Testing: Before: @Test func testExample() { #expect(2 + 2 == 4) } After: @Test(.disabled()) func testExample() { #expect(2 + 2 == 4) } XCTest: Before: func testExample() { XCTAssertEqual(2 + 2, 4) } After: func testExample() throws { throw XCTSkip("Disabled") XCTAssertEqual(2 + 2, 4) }

📅 Opened Mar 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Description Generate computed properties to extract associated values from enum cases. Before: enum Value { case text(String) case number(Int) } After: enum Value { case text(String) case number(Int) var asText: String? { if case let .text(v) = self { return v } return nil } var isText: Bool { if case .text = self { return true } return false } var asNumber: Int? { if case let .number(v) = self { return v } return nil } var isNumber: Bool { if case .number = self { return true } return false } } See also: rust-analyzer generate_enum_as_method

📅 Opened Mar 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Description Replace a temporary variable with its value at all usage sites. Example Before: func example() { let basePrice = item.price let total = basePrice * quantity } After: func example() { let total = item.price * quantity }

📅 Opened Mar 1, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Swift version 6.2.3 Platform Arch Linux Editor Visual Studio Code Swift plugin 2.14.2 and also my own JetBrains plugin (Noctule) Description Refactoring "Convert string literal to minimal number of "#"s" does not handle string literals correctly, which would have to have escaped characters after the conversion. Steps to Reproduce Place the text cursor into the string literal and then invoke the refactoring "Convert string literal to minimal number of "#"s" let x = #"""# The file is then turned into this, which is incorrect because the previously literal double quote `"' is now unescaped: let x = """ I think either the refactoring should not be offered or the result should be properly escaped. Logging No response

📅 Opened Jan 28, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Swift beginner tasks?Explore Swift GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp

When evaluating whether to contribute to swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 22 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 71.7% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp

01

Is swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp has a recorded first-timer success rate of 61.9%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~22 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.2 places swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp?

The external pull request merge rate is 71.7%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp?

Yes, swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for swiftlang/sourcekit-lsp are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.