strands-labs/robots - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Control robots and physical hardware with natural language through Strands Agents.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 74/100

External PR Merge Rate: 88%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is strands-labs/robots welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

strands-labs/robots has a recorded first-timer success rate of 90.0%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in strands-labs/robots respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 30.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 74.4 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 74.4 places strands-labs/robots in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for strands-labs/robots?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for strands-labs/robots is 88.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in strands-labs/robots?

strands-labs/robots does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

strands-labs
strands-labs/robotsSElite131
GitHub
Back to Explorer
strands-labs

strands-labs/robots

131
SElite(74/100)Python

Control robots and physical hardware with natural language through Strands Agents.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.3/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
50%

Strict review standards in strands-labs/robots. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
88.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
90.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
5 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
88.2%
Merge Gauge
90.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe70/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for strands-labs/robots
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/strands-labs/robots)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/strands-labs/robots?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Summary Grow the robot registry beyond the current 68 entries, prioritizing the thin categories. Each robot is a near-trivial, parallelizable PR (JSON entry + auto-download wiring + render smoke test), making this ideal community / good-first-issue fuel. Current coverage (68 robots) aerial(2), arm(21), bimanual(3), expressive(1), hand(8), humanoid(17), mobile(14), mobile_manip(1). The two glaring gaps are mobile_manip (only google_robot) and expressive (only reachy_mini). Candidates (verify upstream asset availability first) mobile-manip: Tiago variants, Toyota HSR, Fetch, Stretch arm configs. expressive: additional Pollen / social robots. (Confirm each via robot_descriptions module presence or a clean source.github MJCF/URDF subdir.) Process / constraints tests/test_registry_integrity.py requires every asset block to declare exactly ONE of: asset.robot_descriptions_module (preferred) asset.source with type: "github" asset.auto_download: false (explicit opt-out) Per-robot PR checkl

📅 Opened Jun 16, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for strands-labs/robots

When evaluating whether to contribute to strands-labs/robots, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of strands-labs/robots acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 88.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to strands-labs/robots

01

Is strands-labs/robots welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

strands-labs/robots has a recorded first-timer success rate of 90.0%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 74.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 74.4 places strands-labs/robots in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for strands-labs/robots?

The external pull request merge rate is 88.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in strands-labs/robots?

strands-labs/robots does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for strands-labs/robots are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.