spinel-coop/rv - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

💎💨 Extremely fast Ruby version and gem manager

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 28/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is spinel-coop/rv welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

spinel-coop/rv has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in spinel-coop/rv respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 27.7 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 27.7 places spinel-coop/rv in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for spinel-coop/rv?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for spinel-coop/rv is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in spinel-coop/rv?

spinel-coop/rv currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

spinel-coop
spinel-coop/rvD•Risky1.8k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
spinel-coop

spinel-coop/rv

1,810
InactiveD•Risky(28/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Rust

💎💨 Extremely fast Ruby version and gem manager

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in spinel-coop/rv welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
4 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for spinel-coop/rv
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/spinel-coop/rv)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/spinel-coop/rv?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

If the flag --offline is passed, rv should try to operate without making network requests. For example, it should not check for available ruby versions, try to install ruby versions, or try to look up or install gems. If it's possible to run without network requests (perhaps a ruby version that meets the requested version is already installed?) it should run with whatever is already present. If it's not possible to run without making network requests, rv should fail with an error explaining the problem and a suggestion to try again without --offline because that might work.

📅 Opened Feb 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Today, we have re-routed all four forms of help to only show the short help, the default clap provides on -h. Instead, let's provide both long and short help, like this: Global -h on any command, like rv ruby pin -h: show short help Global --help on any command, like rv ruby pin --help: show short help rv help [NAME], like rv help ruby pin: show long help rv NAME help, like rv ruby help pin or rv ruby pin help: removed, it's confusing to have many help commands

📅 Opened Jan 28, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

A side-effect of compiling OpenSSL statically, in advance, on a different machine is that we don't get "free" access to the SSL certificates that are stored in the macOS keychain as trusted. This creates problems if you are using tools like caddy or puma-dev that create a Certificate Authority and then install it into the OS as trusted. Browsers will trust those certs, but rv's Ruby (and commands run inside rv, like bundle install) will not trust those certs. I've personally run into this issue while testing local gem servers — bundle install from an rv ruby will fail certificate validation, even though curl and my web browser have no trouble verifying the certs using the OS certificate list. We can work around this by asking the OS for those certs and using them instead of the certs that ship inside the built Ruby: #!/bin/bash security export -t certs -f pemseq -k /Library/Keychains/System.keychain > cert.pem security export -t certs -f pemseq -k /System/Library/Keychains/SystemRoot

📅 Opened Jan 25, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

We have several significant opportunities to improve the ways rv caches things to make the things we do often really fast: set up the cacache crate for the other parts of rv to use unpack ruby and gem tarballs into our cacache, so we only store each file once even if it is in multiple versions of a gem install gems by copy-on-write hardlinking the files in that gem from cacache into the install directory, instead of unpacking tarballs after compiling native extensions, copy the results into cacache. on future installs simply hardlink those files as well, so any particular machine will never compile a gem more than once put git gem clones into the global cache, so you never have to do a full checkout of a git repo (eg rails) a second time

📅 Opened Jan 25, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

It is incredibly awesome and cool that we have both rv tool install and rv tool run working. Their respective final forms have a few extra features that make them less basically-the-same: rvx is a valid way to invoke the rv binary, and when it is invoked via a symlink named rvx, it instead executes rv tool run the install script and homebrew formula should create an rvx symlink pointing to the main rv binary to enable this rv tool run will install a tool into a completely ephemeral GEM_HOME, and not leave an installed tool directory behind after it exits. This is really only feasible after we have some other features around caching and installing finished to make this fast enough. rv tool install will not just install the tool itself, it will also create a binstub in ~/.local/bin/NAME that contains a script to run the tool with the right ruby version and only the specific tool gems available. rv tool install will check to see if ~/.local/bin is included in $PATH, and wil

📅 Opened Jan 25, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for spinel-coop/rv

When evaluating whether to contribute to spinel-coop/rv, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of spinel-coop/rv acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to spinel-coop/rv

01

Is spinel-coop/rv welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

spinel-coop/rv has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 27.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 27.7 places spinel-coop/rv in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for spinel-coop/rv?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in spinel-coop/rv?

Yes, spinel-coop/rv currently has 8 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for spinel-coop/rv are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.