spcl/serverless-benchmarks - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

SeBS: serverless benchmarking suite for automatic performance analysis of FaaS platforms.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 30/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is spcl/serverless-benchmarks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

spcl/serverless-benchmarks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in spcl/serverless-benchmarks respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 29.9 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 29.9 places spcl/serverless-benchmarks in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for spcl/serverless-benchmarks?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for spcl/serverless-benchmarks is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in spcl/serverless-benchmarks?

spcl/serverless-benchmarks currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

spcl
spcl/serverless-benchmarksD•Risky197
GitHub
Back to Explorer
spcl

spcl/serverless-benchmarks

197
InactiveD•Risky(30/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

SeBS: serverless benchmarking suite for automatic performance analysis of FaaS platforms.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Python project in spcl/serverless-benchmarks welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with Python style conventions
  • •Keep PRs scoped and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe30/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for spcl/serverless-benchmarks
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/spcl/serverless-benchmarks)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/spcl/serverless-benchmarks?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Our PyTorch-based benchmark has been recently ported to support Python 3.12. We should verify that it runs on 3.13 and 3.14 on all platforms. Furthermore, we should port dependencies to also run on ARM Lambda instances. Since PyPI packages for torch should have CPU-only wheels for ARM, we can try to use that. On x64, we use custom wheels because we don't want to ship the heavy CUDA bundle.

📅 Opened Aug 12, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

This benchmark relies on a static build of ffmpeg, which we source from an external website. Instead of pulling the ffmpeg binary at every single build, which adds a lot of pressure on that website in CI builds and can lead to errors when pulling data (e.g., rate limits), we could put a pinned and reproducible variant of ffmpeg in our benchmarks-data instead. We should a new resources category in benchmarks-data, and change init.sh script to copy that binary during the initial build. EDIT: we should also revise the command in the function to make sure that we explicitly select codecs and are reproducible.

📅 Opened Aug 7, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

SeBS keeps a local cache of all deployed cloud resources and locally created artifacts, e.g., function builds. To support distributed deployments, we should support a mode where we merge the cache from N existing caches - remove duplicates without losing allocated resources, as long as they share the same SeBS resource ID. This should also drop local resources, as such merged cache should be usable on any machine.

📅 Opened Jul 24, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Currently, the benchmark 411.image-recognition has only a single input class - one image. Since each image taskes roughly the same amount of time, we should generate different classes of input size like small and large by creating a batch of requests to be processed by the function.

📅 Opened Apr 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute

Azure will retire the Consumption Plan in 2028, and they recommend a switch to the Flex Consumption plan. We should add support for this, and make it configurable (like GCP gen1 and gen2). We should also try Windows functions. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/functions-scale

📅 Opened Mar 8, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 55/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for spcl/serverless-benchmarks

When evaluating whether to contribute to spcl/serverless-benchmarks, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of spcl/serverless-benchmarks acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to spcl/serverless-benchmarks

01

Is spcl/serverless-benchmarks welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

spcl/serverless-benchmarks has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 29.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 29.9 places spcl/serverless-benchmarks in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for spcl/serverless-benchmarks?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in spcl/serverless-benchmarks?

Yes, spcl/serverless-benchmarks currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for spcl/serverless-benchmarks are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.