sonic-net/sonic-mgmt - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Configuration management examples for SONiC

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 57%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is sonic-net/sonic-mgmt welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

sonic-net/sonic-mgmt has a recorded first-timer success rate of 52.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in sonic-net/sonic-mgmt respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.3 places sonic-net/sonic-mgmt in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for sonic-net/sonic-mgmt?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for sonic-net/sonic-mgmt is 56.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in sonic-net/sonic-mgmt?

sonic-net/sonic-mgmt currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

sonic-net
sonic-net/sonic-mgmtA•Welcoming277
GitHub
Back to Explorer
sonic-net

sonic-net/sonic-mgmt

277
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(66/100)Python

Configuration management examples for SONiC

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
7.2/10
Patience Score
8.0/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Strict review standards in sonic-net/sonic-mgmt. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
56.9%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
52.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
218 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
56.9%
Merge Gauge
52.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe38/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for sonic-net/sonic-mgmt
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/sonic-net/sonic-mgmt?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Is it platform specific generic Importance or Severity High Description of the test gap For SONiC T2, we have the Linecard which is 400g SKU, but a port was configured to 100g. Now we use GCU patches to remove the 100g port and add port configuration to change the port speed to 400. This test gap is tracking to add a test for this usecase Affected Area GCU Impact of missing tests and proposed tests some of the GCU usecases remain untested

📅 Opened Apr 2, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Is it platform specific broadcom Importance or Severity Low Description of the bug Some tests in drop_packets/test_drop_counters, related to invalid multicast destination MAC packets, fail on topologies using Q3D based fanout device. The below shown predefined trap on the fanout captures the packet causing the test to fail. IRPP predefined traps configured: IpCompMcInvalidIp | VTT_IP_COMP_MC_INVALID_IP(0x18) | 0 | 7 | FALSE Steps to Reproduce Run drop_packets/test_drop_counters.py test on a DUT using Q3D based fanout device. Actual Behavior and Expected Behavior Expected Behavior: This test validates that SONiC correctly drops packets with unicast IP addresses but multicast/broadcast Ethernet destination MAC addresses and properly increments the Layer 3 (L3) drop counters. Actual Behavior: The packets never reach the DUT and the test fails as the fanout traps the packets. Relevant log output FAILED drop_packets/test_drop_counters.py::test_unicast_ip_in

📅 Opened Mar 31, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for sonic-net/sonic-mgmt

When evaluating whether to contribute to sonic-net/sonic-mgmt, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of sonic-net/sonic-mgmt acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 56.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to sonic-net/sonic-mgmt

01

Is sonic-net/sonic-mgmt welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

sonic-net/sonic-mgmt has a recorded first-timer success rate of 52.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.3 places sonic-net/sonic-mgmt in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for sonic-net/sonic-mgmt?

The external pull request merge rate is 56.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in sonic-net/sonic-mgmt?

Yes, sonic-net/sonic-mgmt currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for sonic-net/sonic-mgmt are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.