socai-io/jev-social - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Open-source, local-first social media research agent for Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn. Jev routes read-only steps; socai CLI captures cited browser evidence.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 48/100

External PR Merge Rate: 25%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is socai-io/jev-social welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

socai-io/jev-social has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in socai-io/jev-social respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 28.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 47.7 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 47.7 places socai-io/jev-social in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for socai-io/jev-social?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for socai-io/jev-social is 25.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in socai-io/jev-social?

socai-io/jev-social currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

socai-io
socai-io/jev-socialB•Solid124
GitHub
Back to Explorer
socai-io

socai-io/jev-social

124
Active (30d)B•Solid(48/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)JavaScript

Open-source, local-first social media research agent for Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn. Jev routes read-only steps; socai CLI captures cited browser evidence.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.9/10
Patience Score
8.4/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Highly welcoming maintainers in socai-io/jev-social. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in socai-io/jev-social focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
25.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
25.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe18/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for socai-io/jev-social
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/socai-io/jev-social)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/socai-io/jev-social?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Problem The repository supports a no-clone GitHub install, but the public npm name jev-social is still unclaimed: the registry endpoint returned HTTP 404 on 2026-09-29. Publishing the verified CLI would shorten the first run to npx --yes jev-social@<version> and make the project discoverable through npm without changing the local-browser or read-only execution boundary. The package metadata is already prepared (name, version, bin, explicit files, Node 22+, and the public npm registry). The repository-side release path is now merged in #114; npm-side package ownership and trusted-publisher binding remain. Current state Repository workflow merged in #114 at 193213e. The GitHub npm environment has a one-minute wait and only the v* tag policy. Exact-main Node tests, plugin-security scan, and CodeQL succeeded. Public npm package exists and the initial package claim is complete. npm trusted-publisher binding, provenance, and clean-install verification are complete. Merging #114 did no

📅 Opened Sep 29, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem Captured TikTok or Instagram evidence can render as a native <video controls> element in both the result card and the detail dialog. The current production renderer creates that element without an accessible name, so a screen-reader user may hear only a generic “video” control and cannot tell which captured record it belongs to. The image preview remains decorative because the adjacent card or dialog heading already names the record. This issue is specifically about naming interactive video controls. Suggested scope In public/app.js, give every rendered video preview a concise accessible name derived from the same evidence title used by its card or detail dialog. Pass that context into renderMediaPreview instead of querying nearby DOM text after rendering. Keep media-candidate selection, preview fallback behavior, controls, posters, and evidence data unchanged. Add a focused regression that exercises the production rendering helper or production source and fails if the con

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem The complete evidence table is wrapped in .table-scroll with overflow: auto. On narrow viewports, keyboard-only users cannot move focus into that scroll container, so columns outside the visible area are difficult or impossible to reach without a pointer. Proposed change Make the existing table scroll container a named, keyboard-focusable region and give its focused state a visible high-contrast outline. Keep the table markup, headings, and visible copy unchanged. Suggested scope: public/index.html public/styles.css one focused regression under test/ Acceptance criteria The .table-scroll element can receive keyboard focus without JavaScript and exposes a region role. The region's accessible name is derived from the existing evidence-table heading and description; do not add duplicate visible text. :focus-visible produces a clearly visible outline using the existing palette and does not permanently change layout. The table retains its existing aria-labelledby relationship and

📅 Opened Sep 27, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem Earlier prototype copy used an illustrative “about 30 minutes → about 50 seconds” comparison. The current product is materially different: Jev now selects every operation, total time depends on live browser state and platform response, and the repository deliberately avoids claiming a universal speedup. The README still needs a useful timing comparison, but it must come from a reproducible protocol that separates model latency, browser execution, media work, and evidence coverage. Proposed scope Define three fixed research tasks: one each for Instagram, TikTok, and LinkedIn-capable builds. Pin the Jev model, socai version/commit, result limit, max steps, browser profile mode, region, and warm/cold conditions. Record per-step Jev latency, socai/browser latency, total wall time, records captured, comments read, media downloaded, stop reason, and failure rate. Run enough repetitions to report median and p95 rather than a single demo take. Publish raw, privacy-safe benchmark

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Goal Make Jev Social a reliable, inspectable reference implementation for typed Jev decisions driving real socai browser evidence—not a polished shell around uncertain platform state. Roadmap Phase 1 — Know what can run #18 — Detect socai version and per-platform capability before routing. #19 — Report browser/profile readiness separately from CLI installation. #14 — Document safe Chrome-session and platform-login diagnostics. Keep unsupported platforms out of Jev’s action space. This phase is complete on main. #43 consumes socai v0.6.0's observational status contract, separates browser connection and platform login state from CLI capability, and keeps the browser-facing payload strictly allowlisted. Phase 2 — Never lose observed evidence #20 — Checkpoint each streamed decision and evidence batch atomically. Restore interrupted runs without raw stdout or filesystem paths. #22 — Make the four-card visual summary prefer genuinely previewable media. Phase 3

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more JavaScript beginner tasks?Explore JavaScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for socai-io/jev-social

When evaluating whether to contribute to socai-io/jev-social, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of socai-io/jev-social acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 25.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to socai-io/jev-social

01

Is socai-io/jev-social welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

socai-io/jev-social has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 47.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 47.7 places socai-io/jev-social in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for socai-io/jev-social?

The external pull request merge rate is 25.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in socai-io/jev-social?

Yes, socai-io/jev-social currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for socai-io/jev-social are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.