silverstein/minutes - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Every meeting, every idea, every voice note, searchable by your AI. Open-source, privacy-first conversation memory layer.

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 74/100

External PR Merge Rate: 90%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is silverstein/minutes welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

silverstein/minutes has a recorded first-timer success rate of 62.5%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in silverstein/minutes respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 59.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 74.3 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 74.3 places silverstein/minutes in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for silverstein/minutes?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for silverstein/minutes is 90.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in silverstein/minutes?

silverstein/minutes currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

silverstein
silverstein/minutesSElite1.5k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
silverstein

silverstein/minutes

1,452
SElite(74/100)Rust

Every meeting, every idea, every voice note, searchable by your AI. Open-source, privacy-first conversation memory layer.

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.7/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
40%

Highly welcoming maintainers in silverstein/minutes. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
90.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
62.5%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
6 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
90.2%
Merge Gauge
62.5%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for silverstein/minutes
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/silverstein/minutes)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/silverstein/minutes?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Environment minutes-cli version: 0.23.0 OS: Windows 11 (build 10.0.26200) GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal, compute capability 6.1 / sm_61) CMake: 4.4 Build tool: Ninja 1.13.2 (also reproduced with the default Visual Studio generator) MSVC toolsets tested: 14.51.36231 (VS "18" 2026 Build Tools) and 14.44.35207 (VS2022 Build Tools) CUDA Toolkits tested: 13.3, 12.6, 11.8 (all via NVIDIA's official Windows local installers) Summary Compiling minutes-cli with --features cuda on Windows fails for every CUDA Toolkit version that still supports Pascal (compute_61): CUDA 13.3: nvcc fatal: Unsupported gpu architecture 'compute_61' — expected, since NVIDIA dropped Pascal support in CUDA 13.x. Not a minutes-cli bug, just confirms 13.x can't be used for this GPU generation. CUDA 12.6 (the last version with full Pascal support): the build crashes during CMake's own compiler-identification step — nvcc error: 'cudafe++' died with status 0xC0000005 (ACCESS_VIOLATION) while compiling CMak

📅 Opened Jul 25, 2026💬 7 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Context First, a bit of background: I'm a Windows contributor who's been using Minutes as an end user. The app is genuinely excellent — the pipeline from recording to structured markdown is smooth, and the MCP integration is thoughtful. This is a "thinking out loud" proposal, not a complaint. Happy to hear why the current approach is the right one. The current experience for non-developers When a user opens the Recall panel, they're greeted by a full xterm.js terminal running Claude Code. As a developer I can appreciate the elegance — the assistant workspace is a real directory with CLAUDE.md + CURRENT_MEETING.md, the MCP tools feed live context, skills auto-sync. It's a well-engineered system. But for a non-technical user (or even a technical user who just wants to ask "what did we decide about the budget?"), the experience is jarring: The terminal appearance signals "developer tool" rather than "meeting assistant" The user needs to know what to type and how to interact with a C

📅 Opened Jun 25, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Context From Discussion #44 with @Dieterbe. On Wayland, apps cannot register global hotkeys. The compositor owns global keybindings. The current settings dialog shows a keyboard shortcut picker that won't work on Wayland. What needs to happen Detect Wayland at runtime (check WAYLAND_DISPLAY or XDG_SESSION_TYPE env vars) Replace shortcut picker on Wayland with instructions: Show that minutes toggle-recording and minutes toggle-dictation CLI commands exist Link to documentation for binding these in common compositors (Hyprland bind, GNOME Settings, KDE Shortcuts) Keep the shortcut picker on macOS and X11 where global hotkeys work natively Example compositor config # Hyprland example bind = SUPER, R, exec, minutes toggle-recording bind = SUPER, D, exec, minutes toggle-dictation Relevant code crates/core/src/hotkey_macos.rs - macOS-specific CGEventTap implementation Tauri settings dialog UI Related: Discussion #44

📅 Opened Apr 2, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Context From Discussion #44 with @Dieterbe. The Tauri desktop app settings dialog has two UX issues on Linux: Section organization: Settings appear as one long undifferentiated sequence. Needs clearer visual grouping (headers, dividers, or collapsible sections). White widgets on dark theme: Some native form inputs (likely WebKitGTK-rendered) don't respect the dark mode context, appearing white against a dark background. Screenshots See Discussion #44 for screenshots from Arch Linux / Wayland / Hyprland. What needs to happen Add visual section groupings to the settings dialog (Recording, Transcription, Shortcuts, etc.) Override native form input styles with explicit CSS for the dark theme on Linux/WebKitGTK Test on both dark and light themes Relevant code tauri/ directory contains the desktop app Settings dialog UI components This is a good first contribution since it's visual, self-contained, and doesn't require understanding the audio pipeline. Related: Discussion #44

📅 Opened Apr 2, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for silverstein/minutes

When evaluating whether to contribute to silverstein/minutes, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of silverstein/minutes acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 90.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to silverstein/minutes

01

Is silverstein/minutes welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

silverstein/minutes has a recorded first-timer success rate of 62.5%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 74.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 74.3 places silverstein/minutes in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for silverstein/minutes?

The external pull request merge rate is 90.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in silverstein/minutes?

Yes, silverstein/minutes currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for silverstein/minutes are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.