schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

ESLint/Oxlint plugin to help you write better tailwindcss by improving readability with formatting rules and enforcing best practices with linting rules.

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 21/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 3d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 65.8 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 21.4 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 21.4 places schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss?

schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

schoero
schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcssD•Risky847
GitHub
Back to Explorer
schoero

schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss

847
InactiveD•Risky(21/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)TypeScript

ESLint/Oxlint plugin to help you write better tailwindcss by improving readability with formatting rules and enforcing best practices with linting rules.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe0/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Description Hi! I found this and some other issues, where we have this problem . lint:code: @sabdx/storybook:lint:code: Error: Internal error: Atomics.wait() failed: timed-out . lint:code: @sabdx/storybook:lint:code: Occurred while linting /builds/sab/sabdx/components/sabdx-ui/sabdx-ui-bibliotheken/apps/storybook/src/components/story-header.tsx:22 . lint:code: @sabdx/storybook:lint:code: Rule: "better-tailwindcss/enforce-canonical-classes" . lint:code: @sabdx/storybook:lint:code: at receiveMessageWithId (file:///builds/sab/sabdx/components/sabdx-ui/sabdx-ui-bibliotheken/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/synckit/lib/helpers.js:367:19) . lint:code: @sabdx/storybook:lint:code: at syncFn (file:///builds/sab/sabdx/components/sabdx-ui/sabdx-ui-bibliotheken/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/synckit/lib/helpers.js:385:54) . lint:code: @sabdx/storybook:lint:code: at getCanonicalClasses (file:///builds/sab/sabdx/components/sabdx-ui/sabdx-ui-bibliotheken/no

📅 Opened Jul 3, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Description I'm encountering this issue where, when I run a lint check, sometimes it passes and sometimes it finds issues. I even wrote a script to run a bunch of lint checks over and over on the same code, and it really does seem to be nondeterministic. This is what Claude seems to think the root problem is: eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss uses synckit worker threads to bridge Tailwind CSS's async API into synchronous ESLint rules. When ESLint processes many files, the worker encounters a race condition that causes it to silently fail. This failure corrupts the entire ESLint run — not just better-tailwindcss rules but ALL rules return 0 results. The behavior is non-deterministic: the same command run multiple times gives different results. The issue seems to be related to the number of files being checked. When I run it on fewer files, it catches the issues almost every time. For example, let's say I have 200 files to lint, if I lint them in batches of 10 files, it works (reports

📅 Opened Mar 5, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss

When evaluating whether to contribute to schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss

01

Is schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 21.4 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 21.4 places schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss?

Yes, schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for schoero/eslint-plugin-better-tailwindcss are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.