saphyr-rs/saphyr - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A set of crates dedicated to parsing YAML.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 45/100

External PR Merge Rate: 33%

Response Time: 12d

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is saphyr-rs/saphyr welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

saphyr-rs/saphyr has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in saphyr-rs/saphyr respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 298.6 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 45.3 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 45.3 places saphyr-rs/saphyr in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for saphyr-rs/saphyr?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for saphyr-rs/saphyr is 33.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in saphyr-rs/saphyr?

saphyr-rs/saphyr currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

saphyr-rs
saphyr-rs/saphyrB•Solid340
GitHub
Back to Explorer
saphyr-rs

saphyr-rs/saphyr

340
InactiveB•Solid(45/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Rust

A set of crates dedicated to parsing YAML.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in saphyr-rs/saphyr. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in saphyr-rs/saphyr focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
12 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
33.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
33.3%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe13/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for saphyr-rs/saphyr
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/saphyr-rs/saphyr)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/saphyr-rs/saphyr?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Minimal repro: use saphyr::{LoadableYamlNode, Yaml}; fn main() { let document = Yaml::load_from_str(r#""\uD83D\uDE00""#).unwrap(); dbg!(document); } $ cargo run [...] called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ScanError { mark: Marker { index: 0, line: 1, col: 0 }, info: "while parsing a quoted scalar, found invalid Unicode character escape code" } Expected: correctly parsed string. Actual: ScanError. Why should surrogate escapes be supported? YAML 1.2 claims to be a superset of JSON (spec): The YAML 1.2 specification was published in 2009. Its primary focus was making YAML a strict superset of JSON. JSON supports surrogate pair escapes (spec): To escape an extended character that is not in the Basic Multilingual Plane, the character is represented as a 12-character sequence, encoding the UTF-16 surrogate pair. So, for example, a string containing only the G clef character (U+1D11E) may be represented as "\uD834\uDD1E". The ultimate result is that JSON can't be par

📅 Opened Apr 28, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Summary YamlLoader performs unconditional deep cloning of anchor subtrees when resolving aliases. There is no limit on the number of aliases, the depth of expansion, or the total number of nodes produced. This makes any application that parses untrusted YAML susceptible to a Billion Laughs (alias bomb) attack: a ~100-byte input can produce hundreds of millions of in-memory nodes, exhausting RAM and CPU. Reproduction a: &a ["lol"] b: &b [*a,*a,*a,*a,*a,*a,*a,*a,*a] c: &c [*b,*b,*b,*b,*b,*b,*b,*b,*b] d: &d [*c,*c,*c,*c,*c,*c,*c,*c,*c] e: &e [*d,*d,*d,*d,*d,*d,*d,*d,*d] f: &f [*e,*e,*e,*e,*e,*e,*e,*e,*e] g: &g [*f,*f,*f,*f,*f,*f,*f,*f,*f] h: &h [*g,*g,*g,*g,*g,*g,*g,*g,*g] i: [*h,*h,*h,*h,*h,*h,*h,*h,*h] Parsing this with YamlOwned::load_from_str will attempt to allocate approximately 9^8 (~43 million) String nodes. On most systems this will OOM-kill the process or hang for many seconds before doing so. Root Cause In src/loader.rs, the Event::Alias(id) arm clones the already-expanded subt

📅 Opened Mar 28, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 30/100Contribute

Use Case We're looking to migrate zizmor (a security analysis tool for GitHub Actions) from serde_yaml + tree-sitter-yaml to saphyr. The library seems to be a strong fit over the unmaintained serde_yaml crate. However, we are not yet ready for a migration because we need access to comments for parsing zizmor's own directives like # zizmor: ignore[rulename]. Current State Currently, comments are discarded during scanning. In scanner.rs, the skip_to_next_token function skips over comments without preserving them: // scanner.rs lines 861-863 let comment_length = self.input.skip_while_non_breakz(); self.mark.index += comment_length; self.mark.col += comment_length; source Requested Feature We would need the ability to access comments associated with YAML nodes. One approach that seems to fit the existing architecture: Scanner - Tokenize comments instead of discarding them Parser - Emit Event::Comment(Comment) events (fits naturally alongside existing Event::Scalar, Event::MappingStart, et

📅 Opened Jan 28, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for saphyr-rs/saphyr

When evaluating whether to contribute to saphyr-rs/saphyr, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of saphyr-rs/saphyr acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 12 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 33.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to saphyr-rs/saphyr

01

Is saphyr-rs/saphyr welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

saphyr-rs/saphyr has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~12 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 45.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 45.3 places saphyr-rs/saphyr in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for saphyr-rs/saphyr?

The external pull request merge rate is 33.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in saphyr-rs/saphyr?

Yes, saphyr-rs/saphyr currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for saphyr-rs/saphyr are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.