run-llama/llama_index - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

LlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AI

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 52/100

External PR Merge Rate: 12%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is run-llama/llama_index welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

run-llama/llama_index has a recorded first-timer success rate of 13.4%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in run-llama/llama_index respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 24.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 52.2 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 52.2 places run-llama/llama_index in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for run-llama/llama_index?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for run-llama/llama_index is 12.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in run-llama/llama_index?

run-llama/llama_index currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

run-llama
run-llama/llama_indexB•Solid52.3k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
run-llama

run-llama/llama_index

52,311
InactiveB•Solid(52/100)Python

LlamaIndex is the document processing platform for AI

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
7.1/10
Patience Score
7.5/10
Nitpick Rate
37%

Balanced & professional review environment in run-llama/llama_index. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
12.4%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
13.4%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
159 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
12.4%
Merge Gauge
13.4%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe20/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for run-llama/llama_index
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/run-llama/llama_index)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/run-llama/llama_index?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

Bug Description RankLLMRerank cannot be imported, unless vllm is installed. This is true even when using a backend that has nothing to do with vLLM. Reason: llama_index.postprocessor.rankllm_rerank.base imports PromptMode and Reranker from rank_llm.rerank at module level: from rank_llm.rerank.rankllm import PromptMode from rank_llm.rerank.reranker import Reranker In the current release 0.25.7, importing anything from rank_llm.rerank executes rank_llm/rerank/__init__.py, which unconditionally imports reranker.py. That file unconditionally imports rank_llm.rerank.listwise, which executes rank_llm/rerank/listwise/__init__.py. That file imports RankListwiseOSLLM, which performs a module-level bare import vllm. In turn, vllm pulls in CUDA-only packages, which have no macOS wheels available. So the issue isn't just "vllm isn't installed" — on Apple Silicon it cannot be installed as a dependency to begin with. Note: #21789 already fixed the earlier problem of PromptMode not being importable

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Feature Description Measured on llama-index-core 0.14.24, SQLite via aiosqlite, macOS arm64, Python 3.12, with the open MIT suite agmi (https://github.com/tech4biz-yasha/agmi, row llamaindex-memory-sqlite). Method: seed a session through Memory.aput_messages(), apply one edit directly to the llama_index_memory table with no keys, open a fresh Memory on the same database, read through Memory.aget(), and record what the library does. Result: all eight storage-level edits are accepted, meaning aget() returns without raising and the edited history becomes the agent's context. T1 text changed inside a message's data T2 newest messages deleted, so the agent resumes from an older state T3 one message removed from the middle T4 two messages swapped T5 a new message inserted by the attacker T6 another session's message copied over this session's row, key kept (user B's message served as user A's) T7 an older message of the same session copied over the newest T8 the row's timestamp rewritten, te

📅 Opened Sep 25, 2026💬 10 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

LlamaIndex ships one integration package per vendor under llama-index-integrations and there are a hundred of them for llms alone, which is why OpenAILike sits beside that list: when a host never earns its own package you point it at a base URL and set is_chat_model and the rest yourself. The docstring example inside the class points at a generic hostname with api_key set to fake, and that is exactly what the API reference page renders for it. An open request from August asks for a named hosted example on that page, and the awkward part it runs into is the same one a wallet endpoint has: there is an api_base to fill in and nothing that looks like a credential for the other field. BlockRun is one OpenAI compatible base URL serving chat, image, video, music, speech and sound effects, and every call pays for itself in USDC over x402, so there is no API key to hold and nothing that belongs in that field. https://blockrun.ai Where would an endpoint like that sit for you, a named example nex

📅 Opened Sep 25, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

GeoMind — Knowledge Source for LlamaIndex GeoMind (https://shanhai-geo.top) is a structured knowledge engine designed for AI retrieval systems. We believe it's an ideal knowledge source for LlamaIndex. What we provide 201 structured knowledge pages with explicit relationships 7,356 cross-reference links (knowledge graph) Schema.org markup on every page for entity extraction All content open, verifiable, source-traceable Global CDN (Cloudflare, 275+ edge nodes) For LlamaIndex Use GeoMind pages as a SimpleWebPageReader source Build indices over our structured knowledge Test LlamaIndex's retrieval quality against our explicit link structure Open access, no auth. Sitemap: 204 URLs | llms.txt available | IndexNow integrated

📅 Opened Sep 3, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for run-llama/llama_index

When evaluating whether to contribute to run-llama/llama_index, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of run-llama/llama_index acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 12.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to run-llama/llama_index

01

Is run-llama/llama_index welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

run-llama/llama_index has a recorded first-timer success rate of 13.4%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 52.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 52.2 places run-llama/llama_index in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for run-llama/llama_index?

The external pull request merge rate is 12.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in run-llama/llama_index?

Yes, run-llama/llama_index currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for run-llama/llama_index are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.