rpamis/comet - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Comet: agent skill harness for turning ideas into evaluated workflows

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 69/100

External PR Merge Rate: 77%

Response Time: 22h

First Timer Success: 82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is rpamis/comet welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

rpamis/comet has a recorded first-timer success rate of 81.8%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in rpamis/comet respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 21.7 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 68.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 68.5 places rpamis/comet in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for rpamis/comet?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for rpamis/comet is 76.5%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in rpamis/comet?

rpamis/comet currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

rpamis
rpamis/cometA•Welcoming3.2k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
rpamis

rpamis/comet

3,171
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(69/100)JavaScript

Comet: agent skill harness for turning ideas into evaluated workflows

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
35%

Collaborative maintainer environment in rpamis/comet. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
21 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
76.5%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
81.8%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
15 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
76.5%
Merge Gauge
81.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe69/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for rpamis/comet
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/rpamis/comet)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/rpamis/comet?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

🔎 Existing issue check 已搜索现有 issue。相关:#352(要求区分 CodeGraph CLI/项目索引/MCP 注册三态)、#409(doctor 漏检 Codex 项目级 CodeGraph MCP 配置并误报未注册,已闭)、#135(doctor 其它假阴性,已在 0.4.0-beta.1 修复)。 上述均未覆盖本报告的两个问题:parseJsonLike() 的块注释剥离不识别字符串字面量,以及 inspectJsonMcpEntry() 不识别 opencode v2 的 mcp.servers.<name> 形状。 🎯 Affected area domains/integrations/codegraph.ts(parseJsonLike / inspectJsonMcpEntry),以及 comet doctor 的 CodeGraph 注册诊断输出。 📦 Comet version 0.4.4(npm latest,即当前无更新版本可等)。宿主:opencode v2.0.26,Linux/WSL2。 💥 Current behavior comet doctor --json 对 opencode 报: { "id": "opencode", "scope": "both", "configPath": "~/.config/opencode/opencode.jsonc", "registered": false, "valid": false, "effective": false, "detail": "unable to read ~/.confi

📅 Opened Oct 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

🧭 Problem Comet 目前没有 Prime Agent(PrimeIntellect-ai/prime-agent)平台适配,在 Prime Agent 项目里无法原生安装 Comet 工作流。 dist/platform/install/platforms.js 的 PLATFORMS 里有 30+ 个平台(含 pi、oh-my-pi、dsh 等),但没有 prime-agent。我实测了在当前项目里直接跑 comet init --platform prime-agent(Comet CLI 0.4.3,Prime Agent 0.9.8),结果分三部分: 1. Skills 装到了 Prime Agent 读不到的位置 CLI 没有校验 platform id 是否在 PLATFORMS 里,而是从 id 推导目录名,生成了: .prime-agent/skills/comet/SKILL.md .prime-agent/skills/comet-native/SKILL.md .prime-agent/rules/comet-workflow-guard.md .prime-agent/settings.local.json # 含 PreToolUse hook 但 Prime Agent 的 skill 发现路径是(docs/skills.md): 全局:~/.prime/agent/skills/、~/.agents/skills/ 项目:.prime/agent/skills/、以及 cwd 到 git 根之间各级的 .agents/skills/ 另有 packages / settings / --skill / 内

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

🔎 Existing issue check I have searched the existing issues. 🎯 Affected area Dashboard (domains/dashboard) 📦 Comet version 0.4.3 💥 Current behavior 记录了项目记忆条数过多时,dashboard无法滚动查看 ✅ Expected behavior 能够滚动查看项目记忆,复用现有的dashboard内页滚动效果,参考检索测试 🔁 Steps to reproduce 1 🖥️ Environment - OS: - Shell: - Node: - Package manager: - Install scope: project / global - Skill language: en / zh - Target AI platform(s): 📋 Logs or output 🧩 Additional context No response

📅 Opened Sep 24, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

🔎 Existing issue check I have searched the existing issues. 🧭 Problem 现在只能够通过cc和codex环境兼容dsh、comet未原生支持dsh init ✨ Proposed solution 期望 原生在comet init、comet update、comet uninstall中支持dsh 包括skill、rule、hook、script、reference分发 复用现在comet cli中既有逻辑,需调查dsh官方各种功能安装路径 🎯 Primary area Platform adapter / installer (platform/*) 🪐 Workflow phase None 🔀 Alternatives considered No response 🧰 Compatibility notes No response 🧩 Additional context No response

📅 Opened Aug 20, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

🔎 Existing issue check Searched open and closed issues for workspace, classicCommandProjectRoot, and context unavailable. No duplicate found (#302 is the feature that introduced the command; #304 is a different CWD-resolution bug in guard). 🎯 Affected area Classic workflow runtime (domains/comet-classic) 📦 Comet version 0.4.0-beta.18 (latest published) 💥 Current behavior Every comet classic workspace invocation fails with exit code 70 and Classic command project context is unavailable. This affects both subcommands (prepare, resolve) and all three isolation modes (current, branch, worktree) — six combinations, same error. Because comet-open step 0b instructs the agent to run comet classic workspace prepare <name> --isolation <mode> before creating OpenSpec artifacts and .comet.yaml, the documented Classic open flow cannot complete as written. In practice current isolation is unaffected in outcome (prepare creates no branch or directory, and comet state init --isolation cu

📅 Opened Aug 18, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more JavaScript beginner tasks?Explore JavaScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for rpamis/comet

When evaluating whether to contribute to rpamis/comet, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of rpamis/comet acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 21 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 76.5% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to rpamis/comet

01

Is rpamis/comet welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

rpamis/comet has a recorded first-timer success rate of 81.8%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~21 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 68.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 68.5 places rpamis/comet in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for rpamis/comet?

The external pull request merge rate is 76.5%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in rpamis/comet?

Yes, rpamis/comet currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for rpamis/comet are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.