ros-controls/ros2_control - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Generic and simple controls framework for ROS 2

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 63/100

External PR Merge Rate: 61%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ros-controls/ros2_control welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ros-controls/ros2_control has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.1%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in ros-controls/ros2_control respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 54.9 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 62.7 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 62.7 places ros-controls/ros2_control in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ros-controls/ros2_control?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for ros-controls/ros2_control is 61.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in ros-controls/ros2_control?

ros-controls/ros2_control currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

ros-controls
ros-controls/ros2_controlA•Welcoming1.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
ros-controls

ros-controls/ros2_control

1,028
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(63/100)C++

Generic and simple controls framework for ROS 2

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in ros-controls/ros2_control. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Verify all existing package test suites run cleanly
  • •Use conventional commit messages and clean branch names
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
61.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
42.1%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
30 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
61.0%
Merge Gauge
42.1%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe37/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for ros-controls/ros2_control
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/ros-controls/ros2_control)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/ros-controls/ros2_control?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

The docstring from the init method from JointLimiterInterface is a bit inaccurate. In particular: /** * Wrapper init method that accepts the joint names and their limits directly */ ... virtual bool init( const std::vector<std::string> & joint_names, const std::vector<joint_limits::JointLimits> & joint_limits, const std::vector<joint_limits::SoftJointLimits> & soft_joint_limits, const rclcpp::node_interfaces::NodeParametersInterface::SharedPtr & param_itf, const rclcpp::node_interfaces::NodeLoggingInterface::SharedPtr & logging_itf) .... This overload also takes soft_joint_limits, not just names and limits as mentioned in the docstring. For instance: /** * Wrapper init method that accepts the joint names, their limits directly, and the soft joint limits. */

📅 Opened Jun 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I have an actuator that has a position command interface, as well as position and velocity state interfaces. My robot description looks a bit like this: <joint name="my_joint" type="prismatic"> <limits lower="-10.0" upper="10.0" velocity="0.1" effort="10" /> </joint> <ros2_control name="MockJoint" type="system"> <hardware> <plugin>mock_components/GenericSystem</plugin> </hardware> <joint name="my_joint"> <command_interface name="position" /> <state_interface name="position" /> <state_interface name="velocity" /> </joint> </ros2_control> The controller manager's parameters: controller_manager: ros__parameters: update_rate: 50 enforce_command_limits: true # because I'm using Jazzy I want to enable limiting on the position command, however, this also sets has_velocity_limits (and all the others) to true. Controller manager log: [ros2_control_node-1] [INFO] [controller_manager]: Using Join

📅 Opened Mar 28, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute

• ## Summary ThreadSanitizer reports data races in controller_manager::ControllerManager during concurrent control-cycle updates. Affected Location controller_manager/src/controller_manager.cpp:2241 ControllerManager::RTControllerListWrapper::update_and_get_used_by_rt_list() controller_manager/src/controller_manager.cpp:2186 ControllerManager::update(rclcpp::Time const&, rclcpp::Duration const&) Observed Result ThreadSanitizer reports concurrent writes in both paths. WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=413) Write of size 4 ... #0 ...update_and_get_used_by_rt_list() .../controller_manager.cpp:2241 Previous write of size 4 ...

📅 Opened Mar 6, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for ros-controls/ros2_control

When evaluating whether to contribute to ros-controls/ros2_control, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of ros-controls/ros2_control acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 61.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to ros-controls/ros2_control

01

Is ros-controls/ros2_control welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

ros-controls/ros2_control has a recorded first-timer success rate of 42.1%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 62.7 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 62.7 places ros-controls/ros2_control in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for ros-controls/ros2_control?

The external pull request merge rate is 61.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in ros-controls/ros2_control?

Yes, ros-controls/ros2_control currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for ros-controls/ros2_control are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.