roboflow/trackers - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Trackers gives you clean, modular re-implementations of leading multi-object tracking algorithms released under the permissive Apache 2.0 license. You combine them with any detection model you already use.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 67/100

External PR Merge Rate: 79%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is roboflow/trackers welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

roboflow/trackers has a recorded first-timer success rate of 77.8%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in roboflow/trackers respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 48.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.6 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.6 places roboflow/trackers in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for roboflow/trackers?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for roboflow/trackers is 79.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in roboflow/trackers?

roboflow/trackers currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

roboflow
roboflow/trackersA•Welcoming3.9k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
roboflow

roboflow/trackers

3,934
InactiveA•Welcoming(67/100)Python

Trackers gives you clean, modular re-implementations of leading multi-object tracking algorithms released under the permissive Apache 2.0 license. You combine them with any detection model you already use.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
9.5/10
Patience Score
9.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in roboflow/trackers. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
2 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
79.2%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
77.8%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
12 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
79.2%
Merge Gauge
77.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe55/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for roboflow/trackers
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/roboflow/trackers)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/roboflow/trackers?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (4)

View on GitHub

BoTSORTTracklet and McByteTracklet already share ~250 near-identical lines (_configure_initial_noise, _build_process_noise, _build_measurement_noise, _set_scale_aware_noise, both _refresh_*_noise_from_state, all _clamp_* static methods, _SIGMA_P/_SIGMA_V/_SIGMA_M). PR #578 added a 5-line _diagonal_matrix helper duplicated verbatim across both files, on top of the existing duplication. Extract to a shared base class or mixin; fold _diagonal_matrix into that work. Shared home options: utils/matrix.py, module-internal privacy utils/_matrix.py, exposing a public diagonal_matrix — a third consumer already exists at src/trackers/utils/motion_models.py:236 Constraint: do not add to src/trackers/__init__.py — that surface is the stable public API per repo convention. Source: /oss:review PR #578 report, .reports/review/2026-09-10T11-04-46Z/review-report.md, finding A1.

📅 Opened Sep 10, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description MOT preprocessing follows TrackEval, but the ground-truth class sets are hardcoded to MOT17. TrackEval branches on the benchmark and we do not: # trackeval/datasets/mot_challenge_2d_box.py distractor_class_names = ['person_on_vehicle', 'static_person', 'distractor', 'reflection'] if self.benchmark == 'MOT20': distractor_class_names.append('non_mot_vehicle') # src/trackers/io/mot.py:31 # TODO(MOT20): MOT20 additionally treats non_mot_vehicle (6) as a distractor; # thread a benchmark parameter through _prepare_mot_sequence to support it. _DISTRACTOR_CLASSES = (2, 7, 8, 12) Ground-truth rows fall into three buckets. Scored: pedestrian (1), where a matched detection is a TP. Distractor: dropped before the metrics, no penalty. Neither: a detection on top of it counts as a false positive. MOT20 puts non_mot_vehicle (6) in the second bucket and we put it in the third, so on MOT20 a tracker is charged false positives that TrackEval forgives. On a synthetic four-row sequence, sa

📅 Opened Sep 9, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Description Add a trackers download CLI subcommand that lets users download benchmark datasets from a GCP bucket. Supports downloading full datasets or individual splits, with or without video frames. Datasets: MOT17, SportsMOT, SoccerNet Tracking, DenseTrack. Proposed CLI interface # List what's available trackers download --list # Download full dataset trackers download mot17 # Download specific split, annotations only trackers download mot17 --split train --annotations-only # Custom output path trackers download sportsmot --split val -o ./datasets Tasks Research and document the structure of each dataset (MOT17, SportsMOT, SoccerNet Tracking, DenseTrack): available splits, contents per split (frames, GT annotations, detections), directory layout. Prepare zip files for each dataset/split/variant combination and upload them to a GCP bucket. Create a dataset manifest (mapping dataset + split + variant to GCP URLs and metadata) inside the codebase. Register the download subcommand

📅 Opened Feb 11, 2026💬 29 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute

Description Generate sample videos for each benchmark dataset used in the Tracker Comparison documentation page. Each video takes ground-truth annotations (bounding boxes + IDs from the dataset's TXT files), draws them on the corresponding frames using the same visual style as the Tracker CLI, and exports a video. Three videos per dataset, four datasets total (12 videos). Upload to GitHub for review; the best one per dataset will later be embedded in the docs. Tasks Identify and select three representative sequences from each of the four datasets (MOT17, SportsMOT, SoccerNet Tracking, DenseTrack). 12 sequences total. Write a script that loads ground-truth MOT TXT annotations and corresponding video frames for a given sequence, using the existing parsers in trackers/io/mot.py. Visualize annotations on each frame: draw bounding boxes and labels (tracker ID + class name if available) with black text at top-left, box and label background colored by tracker ID. Match the Tracker CLI vis

📅 Opened Feb 11, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for roboflow/trackers

When evaluating whether to contribute to roboflow/trackers, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of roboflow/trackers acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 2 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 79.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to roboflow/trackers

01

Is roboflow/trackers welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

roboflow/trackers has a recorded first-timer success rate of 77.8%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~2 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.6 places roboflow/trackers in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for roboflow/trackers?

The external pull request merge rate is 79.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in roboflow/trackers?

Yes, roboflow/trackers currently has 2 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for roboflow/trackers are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.