risingwavelabs/risingwave - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Event streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 66/100

External PR Merge Rate: 63%

Response Time: 1d

First Timer Success: 49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is risingwavelabs/risingwave welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

risingwavelabs/risingwave has a recorded first-timer success rate of 48.7%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in risingwavelabs/risingwave respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 27.3 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 66.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 66.2 places risingwavelabs/risingwave in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for risingwavelabs/risingwave?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for risingwavelabs/risingwave is 63.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in risingwavelabs/risingwave?

risingwavelabs/risingwave currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

risingwavelabs
risingwavelabs/risingwaveA•Welcoming9.4k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
risingwavelabs

risingwavelabs/risingwave

9,364
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(66/100)Rust

Event streaming platform for agentic AI. Continuously ingest, transform, and serve event streams in real time, at scale.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Quality Architect

Warmth Score
6.6/10
Patience Score
7.2/10
Nitpick Rate
43%

Rigorous architecture standards (66% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in risingwavelabs/risingwave.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
63.0%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
48.7%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
38 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
63.0%
Merge Gauge
48.7%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe49/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for risingwavelabs/risingwave
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/risingwavelabs/risingwave)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/risingwavelabs/risingwave?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (3)

View on GitHub

Describe the bug Describe the bug Two materialized views over the same 200-row table produce identical output (200 rows each, zero differing rows), but one uses ~33x the state: internal tables state total per row UDF body has FROM, called twice 10 4,323,812 B 21,619 B UDF body has no FROM, called twice 1 129,792 B 649 B payload is a JSONB column averaging 1,542 bytes. The cause: a LANGUAGE sql UDF whose body contains a FROM clause is inlined as a correlated subquery. When such a UDF is called two or more times in the same streaming job, the optimizer unnests it into StreamHashJoin, and the argument expression becomes the join key. It then lands in stream_key, so the whole JSONB value is materialized in the join's internal state — once per call site. Calling it once produces a plain StreamProject. A UDF with the same semantics but no FROM in its body produces StreamProject no matter how many times it is called. The plan CREATE FUNCTION g_from(j JSONB) RETURNS VARCHAR LANG

📅 Opened Sep 11, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Summary The Webhook source already provides an excellent way to ingest HTTP POST events directly into RisingWave. However, many webhook providers require an initial HTTP GET verification handshake before POST events can be delivered. Examples include: Meta Graph API Facebook Webhooks Instagram Graph API WhatsApp Cloud API Messenger Platform Currently this appears to be the only missing piece preventing RisingWave from acting as a complete webhook endpoint. Current situation Today the webhook connector supports: HTTP POST ingestion HMAC validation Bearer/API key validation Secret management JSON payload ingestion This already covers most of the production requirements. However Meta requires an initial verification request: GET /webhook? hub.mode=subscribe& hub.verify_token=my-token& hub.challenge=123456789 The endpoint must: validate hub.verify_token return HTTP 200 return the value of hub.challenge as the response bo

📅 Opened Jul 10, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Problem When an upstream SQL Server table has its CDC disabled (via EXEC sys.sp_cdc_disable_table) while a RisingWave SQL Server CDC source is actively streaming from it, the sync silently stops for that table: No error is raised on the RW side SELECT FROM <cdc_table> continues to return rows as of the moment of disable_table The source / table remains in a "healthy" state from RW's perspective All subsequent upstream writes are permanently invisible to RW This is a real silent-data-loss footgun. Users typically do not realize that disabling CDC upstream terminates downstream sync with zero signal. Root Cause sp_cdc_disable_table atomically drops: The change table cdc.<schema>_<table>_CT The function cdc.fn_cdc_get_all_changes_<instance> The metadata row in cdc.change_tables Debezium's SQL Server connector handles the resulting Invalid object name SQL error in SqlServerStreamingChangeEventSource#processErrorFromChangeTableQuery by: Logging a single INFO line: Table is no longer ca

📅 Opened May 28, 2026💬 6 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for risingwavelabs/risingwave

When evaluating whether to contribute to risingwavelabs/risingwave, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of risingwavelabs/risingwave acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 63.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to risingwavelabs/risingwave

01

Is risingwavelabs/risingwave welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

risingwavelabs/risingwave has a recorded first-timer success rate of 48.7%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 66.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 66.2 places risingwavelabs/risingwave in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for risingwavelabs/risingwave?

The external pull request merge rate is 63.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in risingwavelabs/risingwave?

Yes, risingwavelabs/risingwave currently has 3 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for risingwavelabs/risingwave are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.