reshaprio/reshapr - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

The open source, no-code MCP Server for AI-Native API Access

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 52%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is reshaprio/reshapr welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

reshaprio/reshapr has a recorded first-timer success rate of 40.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in reshaprio/reshapr respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 58.2 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 58.2 places reshaprio/reshapr in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for reshaprio/reshapr?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for reshaprio/reshapr is 51.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in reshaprio/reshapr?

reshaprio/reshapr currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

reshaprio
reshaprio/reshaprA•Welcoming130
GitHub
Back to Explorer
reshaprio

reshaprio/reshapr

130
InactiveA•Welcoming(58/100)Java

The open source, no-code MCP Server for AI-Native API Access

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.5/10
Patience Score
8.6/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Highly welcoming maintainers in reshaprio/reshapr. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
51.9%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
40.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
7 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
51.9%
Merge Gauge
40.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe33/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for reshaprio/reshapr
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/reshaprio/reshapr)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/reshaprio/reshapr?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

At some point in the MCP Server tuning/development lifecycle, the user may want to convert the created artifacts into Kubernetes Custom Resource to make their deployment totally reproducible in other steps of the deployment lifecycle using a GitOps approach. This is actually a basic thing, as transforming an artifact into a Custom Resource is just wrapping it with Kubernetes metadata, but we have to think about where to make this option available: Via the CLI? Via the Web UI? Should it be something available via the API but only implemented in the clients (CLI & Web UI)? Should we also plan to build some kind of bundle to wrap many Custom Resources together and create a coherent package? I'd like to hear from the community on the different options and ideas around this.

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Web UI was first initialized using the @lucide/svelte icons package and then moved to @hugeicons/svelte because of the many more icons available. However, we still have some Lucide icons in some remaining pages... For better consistency, lighter package weight and less maintenance, it will be great to rationalize and finalize the migration to HugeIcons. Here's a mapping table below: Lucide (@lucide/svelte/icons/…) Hugeicons (@hugeicons/core-free-icons) check Tick02Icon x Cancel01Icon search Search01Icon trash-2 Delete02Icon pencil PencilEdit02Icon minus MinusSignIcon ellipsis-vertical MoreVerticalIcon chevron-right ArrowRight01Icon chevron-down ArrowDown01Icon chevron-up ArrowUp01Icon plus PlusSignIcon copy Copy01Icon key-round Key01Icon user-lock UserLock01Icon message-square-lock MessageLock02Icon

📅 Opened Oct 2, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

As of today, CLI is targeting only the end-users of Reshapr. Admin operations are only available via shell scripts provided as examples of how to use the APIs or via the We UI. Here's a list of operations and whether they are available via script or UI: Feature Script Web UI  Creating a new user   ✅ ✅  Creating a new organization   ✅ ✅ Assigning quotas to an org   ✅ ⛔ (see #345) Managing memberships   ⛔ ⚠️ (see #346) Creating service account   ✅ ⛔ As using the Web UI is convenient, its deployment is still optional. The first question is whether we should also consider making the above features into CLI commands, or if providing scripts using the raw admin API is enough. If the answer to the above question is "yes", then we must define how the CLI will have access to the admin API that requires admin authentication (using the admin API key that is defined at Reshapr deployment). We can easily provide reshapr admin <command> like commands

📅 Opened Aug 13, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

From the beginning, we planned to have user/organization membership management, but we didn't define how to use it. The only thing possible at the moment is to assign membership from the Web UI at the time of the user creation. It's not possible after that to come back and change things. We need to add the ability for a user - when she is defined as the owner of an organization - to manage memberships and to allow her to make other users members of this organization. The trick here (as Reshapr is made to be multitenant) is that we shouldn't give the owner the ability to browse the user list and be aware of who is using Reshapr. Membership management should be done only by email address (property typed by the owner), and then the system should say "OK, I added he/her as a member" or "This email address does not match any existing user account". Likewise, the owner should also be able to remove members from an organization.

📅 Opened Aug 13, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

We should add "Operations" just beside "Included" so that the information will be clearer:

📅 Opened Aug 7, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Java beginner tasks?Explore Java GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for reshaprio/reshapr

When evaluating whether to contribute to reshaprio/reshapr, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of reshaprio/reshapr acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 51.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to reshaprio/reshapr

01

Is reshaprio/reshapr welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

reshaprio/reshapr has a recorded first-timer success rate of 40.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 58.2 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 58.2 places reshaprio/reshapr in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for reshaprio/reshapr?

The external pull request merge rate is 51.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in reshaprio/reshapr?

Yes, reshaprio/reshapr currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for reshaprio/reshapr are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.