renovatebot/renovate - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Home of the Renovate CLI: Cross-platform Dependency Automation by Mend.io

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 62%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is renovatebot/renovate welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

renovatebot/renovate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 45.8%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in renovatebot/renovate respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 42.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.0 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.0 places renovatebot/renovate in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for renovatebot/renovate?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for renovatebot/renovate is 62.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in renovatebot/renovate?

renovatebot/renovate currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

renovatebot
renovatebot/renovateA•Welcoming22.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
renovatebot

renovatebot/renovate

22,717
Active (30d)A•Welcoming(64/100)TypeScript

Home of the Renovate CLI: Cross-platform Dependency Automation by Mend.io

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Constructive Code Reviewer

Warmth Score
7.4/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
33%

Balanced & professional review environment in renovatebot/renovate. Maintains strict focus on technical quality and test standards.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
62.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
45.8%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
115 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
62.3%
Merge Gauge
45.8%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe39/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for renovatebot/renovate
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/renovatebot/renovate)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/renovatebot/renovate?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

In the Gitlab platform we are using merge_status do determine the status of a merge request. Tough this field has been deprecated since 15.6 ( support ended on the 22th of February 2023). https://docs.gitlab.com/api/merge_requests/#retrieve-a-merge-request Instead we should use detailed_merge_status which is a defined enum https://docs.gitlab.com/api/merge_requests/#merge-status This will be part of v44 as we will increase with that the minimal version of Gitlab required

📅 Opened Jun 20, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Per #44035, having support to extract: [tool.uv] required-version = "0.10.12" would be useful There may be other patterns we can capture, too

📅 Opened Jun 17, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 25/100Contribute

Similar to #42987, via #39276

📅 Opened Apr 29, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 25/100Contribute

Via #37723, extend the support in the Renovate config manager to bump: { "$schema": "https://docs.renovatebot.com/renovate-schema.json", "extends": [ "local>project-blue/components/renovate//src/renovate.json5#0.10.6" ], }

📅 Opened Apr 29, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 15/100Contribute

As noted in #41438, when we're not making sure that the isExecutable flag in renovate/lib/util/git/types.ts Line 63 in 42ee883 isExecutable?: boolean; is set. For instance, using the minimal repro: % copier --version copier 9.14.0 % copier update --skip-answered --defaults --answers-file .copier-answers.yml --vcs-ref v1.1.0 Updating to template version 1.1.0 jamietanna@caerbannog .venv tmp 41438 (git)-[main]* % gst ## main...origin/main M .copier-answers.yml ?? bin/ jamietanna@caerbannog .venv tmp 41438 (git)-[main]* % ls bin deploy.sh jamietanna@caerbannog .venv tmp 41438 (git)-[main]* % ls -al bin total 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 jamietanna staff 96 Mar 30 09:45 . drwxr-xr-x 8 jamietanna staff 256 Mar 30 09:45 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 jamietanna staff 48 Mar 30 09:45 deploy.sh This does correctly copy an executable file, but when Renovate commits it does not set the isExecutable flag. We n

📅 Opened Mar 30, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 30/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for renovatebot/renovate

When evaluating whether to contribute to renovatebot/renovate, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of renovatebot/renovate acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 62.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to renovatebot/renovate

01

Is renovatebot/renovate welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

renovatebot/renovate has a recorded first-timer success rate of 45.8%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.0 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.0 places renovatebot/renovate in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for renovatebot/renovate?

The external pull request merge rate is 62.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in renovatebot/renovate?

Yes, renovatebot/renovate currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for renovatebot/renovate are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.