regent-vcs/re_gent - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Version control for AI agents — track what your agent did, blame any line to a prompt, inspect any step.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 53/100

External PR Merge Rate: 90%

Response Time: 4h

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is regent-vcs/re_gent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

regent-vcs/re_gent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in regent-vcs/re_gent respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 4.1 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 52.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 52.6 places regent-vcs/re_gent in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for regent-vcs/re_gent?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for regent-vcs/re_gent is 90.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in regent-vcs/re_gent?

regent-vcs/re_gent currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

regent-vcs
regent-vcs/re_gentB•Solid798
GitHub
Back to Explorer
regent-vcs

regent-vcs/re_gent

798
InactiveB•Solid(53/100)Go

Version control for AI agents — track what your agent did, blame any line to a prompt, inspect any step.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in regent-vcs/re_gent welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in regent-vcs/re_gent focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
4 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
90.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
1 core
Single maintainer review bottleneck
Diagnostic Health HUD
90.0%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe93/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for regent-vcs/re_gent
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/regent-vcs/re_gent)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/regent-vcs/re_gent?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Create a visual diagram showing re_gent's architecture and add it to CLAUDE.md. What to Create Using mermaid.js or ASCII art, create a diagram showing: File System → Hook → Snapshotter → Object Store Object Store → SQLite Index SQLite Index → CLI (log/blame/show) Acceptance Criteria Diagram is clear and accurate Added to CLAUDE.md under "Conceptual Model" or "Architecture" Shows the data flow for a tool call Shows the relationship between objects (Blob, Tree, Step, Ref) Example (mermaid.js) graph LR A[Claude Code] -->|PostToolUse Hook| B[re_gent Hook] B --> C[Snapshotter] C --> D[Object Store] D --> E[SQLite Index] E --> F[CLI Commands] Loading Estimated Time: 1-2 hours

📅 Opened May 9, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 40/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for regent-vcs/re_gent

When evaluating whether to contribute to regent-vcs/re_gent, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of regent-vcs/re_gent acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 4 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 90.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to regent-vcs/re_gent

01

Is regent-vcs/re_gent welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

regent-vcs/re_gent has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~4 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 52.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 52.6 places regent-vcs/re_gent in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for regent-vcs/re_gent?

The external pull request merge rate is 90.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in regent-vcs/re_gent?

Yes, regent-vcs/re_gent currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for regent-vcs/re_gent are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.