redis/rueidis - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A fast Golang Redis client that supports Client Side Caching, Auto Pipelining, RDMA, etc.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 83%

Response Time: 2d

First Timer Success: 80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is redis/rueidis welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

redis/rueidis has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in redis/rueidis respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 45.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.5 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.5 places redis/rueidis in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for redis/rueidis?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for redis/rueidis is 82.8%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in redis/rueidis?

redis/rueidis currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

redis
redis/rueidisA•Welcoming3.0k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
redis

redis/rueidis

2,983
InactiveA•Welcoming(58/100)Go

A fast Golang Redis client that supports Client Side Caching, Auto Pipelining, RDMA, etc.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

High-Friction Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.1/10
Patience Score
6.8/10
Nitpick Rate
51%

Rigorous architecture standards (77% critical review signals). Ensure PRs strictly follow guidelines before requesting review in redis/rueidis.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add unit tests with >80% coverage for modified code paths
  • •Run repository linter and code formatters locally before pushing
  • •Link relevant GitHub issue ID in PR description pre-flight checklist

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without referencing an existing issue
  • •Do not mix refactoring and feature logic into a single commit
  • •Do not ping maintainers repeatedly within 24 hours of opening
Response Velocity
1 days+
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
82.8%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
80.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
3 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
82.8%
Merge Gauge
80.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe57/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for redis/rueidis
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/redis/rueidis)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/redis/rueidis?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Context: We observed elevated Redis GET/SET failures that correlated strongly with increased DNS latency. Scaling up the CoreDNS pods reduced DNS latency. Subsequently, restarting the application service pods mitigated the Redis errors. While the temporal correlation is clear, the exact mechanism linking DNS latency to client side MOVED errors is not yet fully understood. One plausible explanation is that increased DNS latency caused Redis redirect handling to fail at the client. When a MOVED response was returned, DNS resolution or connection attempts to the redirected node may have exceeded client timeouts, causing the redirect to fail and the original MOVED error to surface. Repeated failures may have left clients with stale topology until service pods were restarted. Is the understanding here accurate? As a follow-up, whether any client-side settings such as retries on MOVED, redirect-specific timeouts, and topology refresh on failures can be tuned to enable self-healing from tran

📅 Opened Jan 24, 2026💬 13 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Go beginner tasks?Explore Go GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for redis/rueidis

When evaluating whether to contribute to redis/rueidis, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of redis/rueidis acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 1 days+. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 82.8% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to redis/rueidis

01

Is redis/rueidis welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

redis/rueidis has a recorded first-timer success rate of 80.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~1 days+. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.5 places redis/rueidis in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for redis/rueidis?

The external pull request merge rate is 82.8%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in redis/rueidis?

Yes, redis/rueidis currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for redis/rueidis are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.