rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

NeoBrutalism SwiftUI components

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 58/100

External PR Merge Rate: 93%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 57.5 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 57.5 places rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism is 92.9%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism?

rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

rational-kunal
rational-kunal/NeoBrutalismBSolid133
GitHub
Back to Explorer
rational-kunal

rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism

133
BSolid(58/100)Swift

NeoBrutalism SwiftUI components

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Growing Swift project in rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Ensure code complies with Swift style conventions
  • Keep PRs scoped and well-documented
  • Include relevant test coverage for changes

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • Do not break existing automated test suites
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
92.9%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
92.9%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe67/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

.github/workflows/ci.yml filters on: paths: - "Sources/**" - "Tests/**" - "Example/**" - ".github/workflows/**" - "Package.swift" Scripts/ isn't listed, but it holds the snapshot contract: Scripts/snapshot-env.sh pins the reference simulator (iPhone 16 / iOS 26.2) and the CI Xcode, and carries the comment "Change ONLY via a PR that also re-records every image". Scripts/test.sh controls how the suite is invoked, including the deliberate -parallel-testing-enabled NO. A PR touching only Scripts/ skips CI entirely, so nothing enforces that rule at exactly the moment it matters most. Suggested fix Add - "Scripts/**" to both the push and pull_request path filters. Found while reviewing #47 (v3.0.0). Not blocking the release.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Sources/NeoBrutalism/Components/Dialog.swift:17-21: /// Tapping the scrim dismisses the dialog; actions must call /// your binding manually (just like SwiftUI's `alert` does). To apply destructive /// styling to a button, pass `.buttonStyle(.neoBrutalism(type: .neutral))` with a /// red-tinted theme, or document the limitation for your consumers. "…or document the limitation for your consumers" is an instruction to whoever was writing the library, not guidance for someone using it. It ships to the hosted DocC page for nbDialog. Worth rewriting that sentence to just state the limitation: Button(role: .destructive) inside nbDialog doesn't get destructive styling, and here's what to do about it. Found while reviewing #47 (v3.0.0). Not blocking the release.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Sources/NeoBrutalism/Components/Menu/NBMenu.swift:193: let screenHeight = UIScreen.main.bounds.height let scrollCap = screenHeight * 0.6 UIScreen.main is not scene-aware — it reports the device screen, not the window the menu is actually in — so the 60% cap is wrong under iPad Split View / Slide Over, in a resized window, or on an external display. It's also deprecated. The value is already available: NBMenuOverlayContent.body wraps everything in a GeometryReader whose proxy.size is passed to placement(in:) a few lines above. Suggested fix Thread that same size into dropdown(elevated:) instead of reaching for UIScreen.main. Found while reviewing #47 (v3.0.0). Not blocking the release.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

NBGaugeStyle.makeBody reads only configuration.value and configuration.label: public func makeBody(configuration: Configuration) -> some View { let value = configuration.value HStack(spacing: theme.spacing) { configuration.label NBBarMeter(fraction: value) … } } — Sources/NeoBrutalism/Components/Gauge/GaugeStyle.swift So a Gauge built with any of the value labels silently loses them: Gauge(value: temp, in: 0...100) { Text("Temp") } currentValueLabel: { Text("\(temp)°") // never rendered } minimumValueLabel: { Text("0") // never rendered } maximumValueLabel: { Text("100") // never rendered } Related: #3 asks for the same thing on NBProgressViewStyle, so the two could share a layout decision. NBGaugeStyle's static var neoBrutalism is also the only style entry point in the library without a doc comment — worth adding in the same pass. Found while reviewing #47 (v3.0.0). Not blocking the rele

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 90/100Contribute

NBSegmentBuilder only implements the variadic buildBlock: @resultBuilder public struct NBSegmentBuilder<Value: Hashable> { public static func buildBlock(_ components: NBSegmentItem<Value>...) -> [NBSegmentItem<Value>] { components } } — Sources/NeoBrutalism/Components/SegmentedPicker/NBSegmentedPicker.swift So neither of these compiles inside an NBSegmentedPicker: NBSegmentedPicker(selection: $size) { ForEach(sizes) { Text($0.name).nbSegment($0) } // ✗ if showExtras { Text("XL").nbSegment(3) } // ✗ } NBMenuBuilder and NBTabBuilder in the same release both implement buildExpression / buildArray / buildOptional / buildEither, so this is an inconsistency between three builders that otherwise look alike. Suggested fix Mirror NBTabBuilder — it's the closest analogue and can be copied nearly verbatim. Found while reviewing #47 (v3.0.0). Not blocking the release.

📅 Opened Aug 23, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Swift beginner tasks?Explore Swift GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism

When evaluating whether to contribute to rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 92.9% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism

01

Is rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 57.5 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 57.5 places rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism?

The external pull request merge rate is 92.9%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism?

Yes, rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism currently has 5 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for rational-kunal/NeoBrutalism are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.