rapina-rs/rapina - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A Rust web framework for APIs. So simple it feels like cheating.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 72%

Response Time: 14h

First Timer Success: 70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is rapina-rs/rapina welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

rapina-rs/rapina has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in rapina-rs/rapina respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 14.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.3 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.3 places rapina-rs/rapina in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for rapina-rs/rapina?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for rapina-rs/rapina is 72.3%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in rapina-rs/rapina?

rapina-rs/rapina currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

rapina-rs
rapina-rs/rapinaA•Welcoming180
GitHub
Back to Explorer
rapina-rs

rapina-rs/rapina

180
InactiveA•Welcoming(64/100)Rust

A Rust web framework for APIs. So simple it feels like cheating.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in rapina-rs/rapina. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
13 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
72.3%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
70.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
13 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
72.3%
Merge Gauge
70.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe69/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for rapina-rs/rapina
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/rapina-rs/rapina)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/rapina-rs/rapina?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Summary This issue is marked as a good first issue — it's a great starting point if you're new to contributing to Rapina. Before picking this up, please read the Contributing Guide. Comment /take to claim this issue. Task The validator crate in the Cargo.toml generated by the rapina new command and in some examples are still in 0.20.0, the most recent one is 0.21.0, bump them Why This Matters If the versions are incompatible, the code wont compile when Validator is used: there are multiple different versions of crate `validator` in the dependency graph Relevant Files rapina-cli/src/commands/templates/mod.rs rapina/examples/todo-app/Cargo.toml and rapina/examples/url-shortner/Cargo.toml Acceptance Criteria Feature/fix is implemented cargo fmt and cargo clippy pass Estimated Effort XS — < 30 minutes Hints & Resources Look at how similar functionality is implemented as a reference Follow existing patterns in the codebase Maintainer Checklist Issue is self-contained and scope

📅 Opened Sep 15, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 100/100Contribute

Summary We added needs: review, needs: author, needs: direction and stale so the PR queue reads at a glance. Those three are derivable from data GitHub already gives us. needs: direction is a judgement call, so the job should never touch it. Why This Matters Three of those four are set by hand right now, which means they'll be wrong within a week, and a label people can't trust is worse than no label at all. Relevant Files No response Acceptance Criteria No response Estimated Effort XS — < 30 minutes Hints & Resources The labels already exist, so this is just the workflow file. gh api graphql covers it, no third-party action needed. Maintainer Checklist Issue is self-contained and scoped for a first-time contributor Relevant files and context are provided above Acceptance criteria are clear and verifiable

📅 Opened Aug 17, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Problem The first cut of the Redis relay backend opens one Redis pub/sub connection per active subscription. fn subscribe(&self, topic: &str) -> ... { let client = self.client.clone(); Box::pin(async move { let mut pubsub = client.get_async_pubsub().await?; // ← new socket, every call pubsub.subscribe(&topic).await?; let (_sink, stream) = pubsub.split(); // sink discarded ... }) } Connection != subscription is conflated: every subscription = a fresh socket. No sharing even for identical topics, 10k clients all on the same topic is still 10k connections, not 1. Goal Before: 1 (publish) connection + one pub/sub conn per subscription After: 2 total connections, flat: 1 publish + 1 shared pub/sub, regardless of sub count The "10k" moves from sockets to cheap in-process state (channel-subscriptions + local broadcast receivers). One shared pub/sub connection can SUBSCRIBE to any number of channels natively; a

📅 Opened Aug 5, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 80/100Contribute

Part of #740. derive_config_impl moves to config.rs, the #[proc_macro_derive] entry stays in lib.rs. Note the entry point and the impl currently sit ~70 lines apart with the schema entry between them, which is exactly the kind of thing this split fixes. Tests go along.

📅 Opened Aug 1, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 75/100Contribute

Part of #740. JobAttr, its Parse impl, and job_macro_impl move to job.rs, entry point stays in lib.rs. Tests go along. Independent of everything else in the file.

📅 Opened Aug 1, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for rapina-rs/rapina

When evaluating whether to contribute to rapina-rs/rapina, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of rapina-rs/rapina acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 13 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 72.3% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to rapina-rs/rapina

01

Is rapina-rs/rapina welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

rapina-rs/rapina has a recorded first-timer success rate of 70.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~13 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.3 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.3 places rapina-rs/rapina in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for rapina-rs/rapina?

The external pull request merge rate is 72.3%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in rapina-rs/rapina?

Yes, rapina-rs/rapina currently has 4 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for rapina-rs/rapina are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.