quantumlib/OpenFermion - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Python package for compiling and analyzing quantum algorithms to simulate electronic structures.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 46/100

External PR Merge Rate: 20%

Response Time: 12h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is quantumlib/OpenFermion welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

quantumlib/OpenFermion has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in quantumlib/OpenFermion respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 11.5 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 46.1 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 46.1 places quantumlib/OpenFermion in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for quantumlib/OpenFermion?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for quantumlib/OpenFermion is 20.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in quantumlib/OpenFermion?

quantumlib/OpenFermion does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

quantumlib
quantumlib/OpenFermionB•Solid1.7k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
quantumlib

quantumlib/OpenFermion

1,743
InactiveB•Solid(46/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Python package for compiling and analyzing quantum algorithms to simulate electronic structures.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in quantumlib/OpenFermion welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
11 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
20.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
8 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
20.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe29/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for quantumlib/OpenFermion
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/quantumlib/OpenFermion)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/quantumlib/OpenFermion?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (2)

View on GitHub

Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? A kind third party has been maintain recipes for Conda distributions: https://anaconda.org/channels/conda-forge/packages/openfermion/overview https://anaconda.org/channels/conda-forge/packages/openfermionpsi4/overview https://anaconda.org/channels/conda-forge/packages/openfermionpyscf/overview The versions there are slightly behind the latest releases. I don't know the process that's used to determine when those distributions are updated, but perhaps there is some mechanism to trigger updates on their side. What solution or approach do you envision? Investigate what is needed to notify the Conda distribution maintainers about new releases of OpenFermion. How urgent is this for you? P3 – not blocked; it's an idea

📅 Opened Jul 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? Gemini Code Assist reported the following for linear_qubit_operator.py. This looks simple enough to do, but it should be checked for correctness, and some kind of unit tests should be added to go along with this. Performance/Memory Overhead in Single-Process Path (Lines 189-190): Using functools.reduce(numpy.add, ...) creates $N-1$ intermediate numpy arrays, where $N$ is the number of operators. For large state vectors, this causes significant memory churn and garbage collection overhead. Fix: Initialize a single zero array and accumulate the results in-place using += as suggested below. if self.options.processes <= 1: res = numpy.zeros(x.shape, dtype=complex) for operator in self.linear_operators: res += operator * x return res Originally posted by @gemini-code-assist[bot] in #1404 (comment) What solution or approach do you envision? GCA's suggestion should be implemen

📅 Opened Jul 14, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for quantumlib/OpenFermion

When evaluating whether to contribute to quantumlib/OpenFermion, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of quantumlib/OpenFermion acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 11 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 20.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to quantumlib/OpenFermion

01

Is quantumlib/OpenFermion welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

quantumlib/OpenFermion has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~11 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 46.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 46.1 places quantumlib/OpenFermion in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for quantumlib/OpenFermion?

The external pull request merge rate is 20.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in quantumlib/OpenFermion?

quantumlib/OpenFermion does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for quantumlib/OpenFermion are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.