quantumlib/Cirq - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Python framework for creating, editing, and running Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) circuits.

C-Rank Grade: A (Welcoming) - 64/100

External PR Merge Rate: 60%

Response Time: 9h

First Timer Success: 50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is quantumlib/Cirq welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

quantumlib/Cirq has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked A typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in quantumlib/Cirq respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 9.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score (A Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 64.1 places quantumlib/Cirq in the A tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for quantumlib/Cirq?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for quantumlib/Cirq is 60.4%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in quantumlib/Cirq?

quantumlib/Cirq currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

quantumlib
quantumlib/CirqA•Welcoming5.1k
GitHub
Back to Explorer
quantumlib

quantumlib/Cirq

5,077
InactiveA•Welcoming(64/100)Python

Python framework for creating, editing, and running Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) circuits.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Active Open-Source Maintainer

Warmth Score
7.8/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Active maintainer team in quantumlib/Cirq welcoming community pull requests and bug fixes.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with repository style conventions
  • •Keep PRs focused and well-documented

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit unlinked PRs without context
  • •Do not break existing automated test suites
Response Velocity
9 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
60.4%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
50.0%
Accepts new contributor PRs

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
25 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
60.4%
Merge Gauge
50.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe62/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for quantumlib/Cirq
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/quantumlib/Cirq)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/quantumlib/Cirq?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? Please explain np.RandomState has been effectively deprecated by numpy but it is still used throughout much of Cirq. Additionally, when multiple threads are used, RandomState also becomes a shared object, causing blocking between threads. Describe the solution you would prefer We should instead use numpy.random.Generator, the modern approach. We should provide a separate path for generating random numbers with Generators and ensure multithreading support. The old RandomState based paths may then be deprecated. Per previous work on this issue, the general approach should be: A new type such as PRNG_OR_SEED_LIKE should be added, allowing for either a generator or a seed. parse_random_generator should be added, which returns a np.random.Generator. Existing calls to parse_random_state within cirq should be replaced with parse_random_generator. parse_random_state should be deprecated. How urgent is this for you? Is it blocking

📅 Opened Sep 23, 2026💬 23 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Describe the issue cirq.defer_measurements does not preserve the record index of a BitMaskKeyCondition. When a measurement key is reused, a condition referring to an earlier record can become an unconditional operation after deferral, changing the measurement result. The index should be preserved, or unsupported conditions should be rejected explicitly. Explain how to reproduce the bug or problem from collections import Counter import cirq q0, q1, q2 = cirq.LineQubit.range(3) condition = cirq.BitMaskKeyCondition( cirq.MeasurementKey("a"), index=0, target_value=0, equal_target=True ) circuit = cirq.Circuit( cirq.X(q0), cirq.measure(q0, key="a"), # First record: 1. cirq.measure(q1, key="a"), # Second record: 0. cirq.X(q2).with_classical_controls(condition), cirq.measure(q2, key="out"), ) simulator = cirq.Simulator() for label, candidate in [ ("original", circuit), ("deferred", cirq.defer_measurements(circuit)), ]: result = simulator.run(candidate,

📅 Opened Sep 20, 2026💬 8 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? Please explain We try to tag issues and PRs with tags such as area/gates or area/performance to improve findability, but we currently do tagging manually on an ad hoc basis. There exist numerous GitHub Actions workflows for automatically labeling things based on such things as the paths to files they involve. We should put in place a workflow with a configurable list of labels and rules (kept separate from the workflow) so that we don’t have to spend time doing it and so that labeling is done more consistently. Describe the solution you would prefer How urgent is this for you? Is it blocking important work? P3 – I'm not really blocked by it; it's an idea I'm proposing based on principle

📅 Opened Sep 15, 2026💬 4 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? Please explain Mypyc compiles Python modules to C extensions. It uses standard Python type hints to generate fast code. Mypyc uses mypy to perform type checking and type inference. Most type system features in the stdlib typing module are supported. Existing code with type annotations is often 1.5x to 5x faster when compiled. Code tuned for mypyc can be 5x to 10x faster. Describe the solution you would prefer Figure out how to make use of mypyc Implement a limited use of mypyc Test before-and-after results on Cirq benchmarks Report the results How urgent is this for you? Is it blocking important work? P3 – I'm not really blocked by it; it's an idea I'm proposing based on principle

📅 Opened Sep 15, 2026💬 2 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? Please explain Numba is an open source, NumPy-aware JIT optimizing compiler for Python. It uses the LLVM compiler project to generate machine code from Python syntax. Numba can compile a large subset of numerically-focused Python, including many NumPy functions. Additionally, Numba has support for automatic parallelization of loops, generation of GPU-accelerated code, and creation of ufuncs and C callbacks. Describe the solution you would prefer Numba claims "You don't need to replace the Python interpreter, run a separate compilation step, or even have a C/C++ compiler installed. Just apply one of the Numba decorators to your Python function, and Numba does the rest." (from https://numba.pydata.org/). So one approach to testing its use is: Find a case where Numba could potentially be used to speed up some aspect of Cirq Test its use and run before-and-after benchmarks Report the results How urgent is this for you? Is it block

📅 Opened Sep 15, 2026💬 3 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for quantumlib/Cirq

When evaluating whether to contribute to quantumlib/Cirq, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of quantumlib/Cirq acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 9 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 60.4% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to quantumlib/Cirq

01

Is quantumlib/Cirq welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

quantumlib/Cirq has a recorded first-timer success rate of 50.0%. Repositories ranked Welcoming typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~9 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 64.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 64.1 places quantumlib/Cirq in the Welcoming tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for quantumlib/Cirq?

The external pull request merge rate is 60.4%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in quantumlib/Cirq?

Yes, quantumlib/Cirq currently has 6 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for quantumlib/Cirq are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.