qualcomm/eld - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Embedded Linker (eld)

C-Rank Grade: S (Elite) - 75/100

External PR Merge Rate: 71%

Response Time: 12h

First Timer Success: 72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is qualcomm/eld welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

qualcomm/eld has a recorded first-timer success rate of 72.2%. Repositories ranked S typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in qualcomm/eld respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 12.2 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 75.1 C-Rank™ score (S Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 75.1 places qualcomm/eld in the S tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for qualcomm/eld?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for qualcomm/eld is 71.2%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in qualcomm/eld?

qualcomm/eld currently has 9 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

qualcomm
qualcomm/eldS•Elite261
GitHub
Back to Explorer
qualcomm

qualcomm/eld

261
Active (30d)S•Elite(75/100)C++

Embedded Linker (eld)

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Welcoming Community Builder

Warmth Score
8.8/10
Patience Score
8.8/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Highly welcoming maintainers in qualcomm/eld. Prompt code reviews with positive guidance for new contributors.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
12 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
71.2%
Moderate PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
72.2%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
23 core
Highly collaborative maintainer core
Diagnostic Health HUD
71.2%
Merge Gauge
72.2%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe71/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for qualcomm/eld
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/qualcomm/eld)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/qualcomm/eld?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (5)

View on GitHub

On ARM/AArch64 --save-temps unexpectedly changes LTO from native object emission to assembly emission and causes invocation of external assembler. A diagnostic option such as --save-temps should not result in changing the linker/compiler/lto flow. Reproducer: #!/usr/bin/env bash set -x mkdir -p tmp cat > tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.c <<\EOF void _start(void) {} EOF cat > tmp/clang <<\EOF #!/usr/bin/env bash exit 99 EOF chmod +x tmp/clang clang --target=aarch64-linux-gnu -flto -c tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.c -o tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.bc ld.eld -march aarch64 -e _start tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.bc -o tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.normal.eld.out PATH=tmp:$PATH ld.eld -march aarch64 --save-temps -e _start tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.bc -o tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.saved.eld.out Output: Note: LTO generated bitcode: tmp/lto-aarch64-save-temps.saved.eld.out.llvm-lto.* Note: Using 8 threads for LTO code generation. Fatal: LTO: Assembler error occurred Fatal: Linking had errors (lto-aarch64

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute

LLVM only supports -O0 to -O3. If values above this are used, then LLVM reaches llvm_unreachable and causes the link to crash. #!/usr/bin/env bash set -x mkdir -p tmp cat > tmp/lto-o4.c <<\EOF void _start(void) {} EOF clang --target=x86_64-linux-gnu -flto -c tmp/lto-o4.c -o tmp/lto-o4.o ld.eld -m elf_x86_64 --lto-O4 -e _start tmp/lto-o4.o -o tmp/lto-o4.eld.out ld.lld -m elf_x86_64 --lto-O4 -e _start tmp/lto-o4.o -o tmp/lto-o4.eld.out lld properly reports invalid optimization error, whereas eld crashes.

📅 Opened Oct 6, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 75/100Contribute

cat > 1.c << \! int foo() { return 0; } ! clang -c 1.c tar cvf a.tar 1.o ld.bfd a.tar ld.eld a.tar We would like to recognize it is tar file and report an error.

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 35/100Contribute

Windows https://github.com/qualcomm/eld/actions/runs/36805262162/job/110188068094 Summarizing ELD lit test results across all configurations Configuration PASS FAIL XFAIL UNSUPPORTED XPASS TIMEOUT TOTAL TIME ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm-default 1409 0 2 1127 0 0 2538 1m32.1s aarch64-default 1304 0 2 1232 0 0 2538 1m22.4s riscv-default 1225 0 0 1313 0 0 2538 1m17.6s hexagon-default 1638 0 1 899 0 0 2538 1m32.0s x86-default 829 0 0 1709 0 0 2538 55.8s riscv64-default 1203 0 0 1335 0 0 2538 1m16.5s x86_32-default 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.4s Linux https://github.co

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 1 comment
Quality: 50/100Contribute

cat > 1.c << \! int foo() { return 0; } ! $clang -c 1.c $ld.eld 1.o $readelf -p .comment a.out String dump of section '.comment': [ 1] clang version 24.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/ c6b15d38928d586064932c3cc26d8c777e104196) [ 6a] Linker 24.0 (ebf1402400117e162c88ceb893a7cdac1f67dcc9) [ a2] LLVM 24.0.0git (c6b15d38928d586064932c3cc26d8c777e104196) $ld.lld 1.o $ readelf -p .comment a.out String dump of section '.comment': [ 1] Linker: LLD 24.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/ c6b15d38928d586064932c3cc26d8c777e104196) [ 65] clang version 24.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/ c6b15d38928d586064932c3cc26d8c777e104196) It would be useful to produce lld style output and make it easy to recognize that eld is used when linking with eld.

📅 Opened Oct 1, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 50/100Contribute
Looking for more C++ beginner tasks?Explore C++ GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for qualcomm/eld

When evaluating whether to contribute to qualcomm/eld, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of qualcomm/eld acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 12 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 71.2% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to qualcomm/eld

01

Is qualcomm/eld welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

qualcomm/eld has a recorded first-timer success rate of 72.2%. Repositories ranked Elite typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~12 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 75.1 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 75.1 places qualcomm/eld in the Elite tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for qualcomm/eld?

The external pull request merge rate is 71.2%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in qualcomm/eld?

Yes, qualcomm/eld currently has 9 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for qualcomm/eld are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.