pymc-devs/pymc-examples - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Examples of PyMC models, including a library of Jupyter notebooks.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 45/100

External PR Merge Rate: 80%

Response Time: <1h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is pymc-devs/pymc-examples welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

pymc-devs/pymc-examples has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in pymc-devs/pymc-examples respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 44.6 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 44.6 places pymc-devs/pymc-examples in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for pymc-devs/pymc-examples?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for pymc-devs/pymc-examples is 80.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in pymc-devs/pymc-examples?

pymc-devs/pymc-examples currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

pymc-devs
pymc-devs/pymc-examplesB•Solid400
GitHub
Back to Explorer
pymc-devs

pymc-devs/pymc-examples

400
Active (30d)B•Solid(45/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Python

Examples of PyMC models, including a library of Jupyter notebooks.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.5/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
20%

Collaborative maintainer environment in pymc-devs/pymc-examples. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in pymc-devs/pymc-examples focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Ensure code complies with the project coding style
  • •Keep PRs scoped to a single concern
  • •Include context and link to the related issue

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not submit PRs without linking an issue
  • •Do not break existing tests without fixing them
  • •Do not mix unrelated refactors in a single PR
Response Velocity
<1 hour
⚡ Fast reviewer response

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
80.0%
High acceptance rate for external PRs

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
80.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe62/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for pymc-devs/pymc-examples
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/pymc-devs/pymc-examples)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/pymc-devs/pymc-examples?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Arviz v1 is going to break everything for sure, but there might be small details that will stop working due to pymc v6/pytensor v3. This issue is a tracker for checking that everything works post-release. Introductory pymc_overview glm_linear api_quickstart Library Fundamentals dimensionality pymc_pytensor data_container How To posterior_predictive model_comparison lkj missing_data_imputation blackbox_external_likelihood_numpy copula_estimation debugging hypothesis_testing marginalizing_models model_builder profiling spline updating_priors wrapping_jax_function Generalized Linear Models glm_binomial_regression glm_discrete_choice_models glm_hierarchical_binomial_model glm_missing_values_in_covariates glm_model_selection glm_negative_binomial_regression glm_ordinal_features glm_ordinal_regression glm_out_of_sample_predictions glm_poisson_regression glm_robust_with_outlier_detection glm_robust glm_rolling_regression glm_truncated_censored_regressi

📅 Opened Apr 23, 2026💬 5 comments
Quality: 70/100Contribute
Looking for more Python beginner tasks?Explore Python GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for pymc-devs/pymc-examples

When evaluating whether to contribute to pymc-devs/pymc-examples, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of pymc-devs/pymc-examples acknowledge new external contributions in approximately <1 hour. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 80.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to pymc-devs/pymc-examples

01

Is pymc-devs/pymc-examples welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

pymc-devs/pymc-examples has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~<1 hour. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 44.6 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 44.6 places pymc-devs/pymc-examples in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for pymc-devs/pymc-examples?

The external pull request merge rate is 80.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in pymc-devs/pymc-examples?

Yes, pymc-devs/pymc-examples currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for pymc-devs/pymc-examples are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.