provos/ironcurtain - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

A secure* runtime for autonomous AI agents. Policy from plain-English constitutions. (*https://ironcurtain.dev)

C-Rank Grade: D (Risky) - 30/100

External PR Merge Rate: -

Response Time: 10h

First Timer Success: -

Frequently Asked Questions

Is provos/ironcurtain welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

provos/ironcurtain has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked D typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in provos/ironcurtain respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 10.4 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 29.9 C-Rank™ score (D Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 29.9 places provos/ironcurtain in the D tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for provos/ironcurtain?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for provos/ironcurtain is 0.0%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in provos/ironcurtain?

provos/ironcurtain currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels like "good first issue", "beginner", or "up-for-grabs".

provos
provos/ironcurtainDRisky579
GitHub
Back to Explorer
provos

provos/ironcurtain

579
DRisky(30/100)TypeScript

A secure* runtime for autonomous AI agents. Policy from plain-English constitutions. (*https://ironcurtain.dev)

Compare
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Strict Architecture Gatekeeper

Warmth Score
6.9/10
Patience Score
7.8/10
Nitpick Rate
30%

Strict review standards in provos/ironcurtain. Ensure PR scope matches issue requirements closely before requesting review.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in provos/ironcurtain focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • 1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • 2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • 3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • Keep PRs small and focused on one change

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • Do not mix unrelated refactors with feature work
Response Velocity
10 hours
Standard maintainer review cycle

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
0.0%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
0.0%
No first-timer merges recorded in window

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
2 core
Small core review team
Diagnostic Health HUD
0.0%
Merge Gauge
0.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe22/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for provos/ironcurtain
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/provos/ironcurtain)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/provos/ironcurtain?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Problem ironcurtain workflow resume <baseDir> constructs and runs a separate in-process WorkflowOrchestrator. Its resumed state is therefore not visible to the daemon-backed Web UI or to ironcurtain workflow status/await, even when the original workflow was launched from the daemon/UI. In the observed case, the legacy CLI resumed a checkpoint and dispatched harness_design, while the daemon continued to report the same workflow as phase: aborted. This creates a second, independently managed execution path against the same run artifacts/checkpoint. Desired behavior Provide a CLI resume command that calls the daemon's existing workflows.resume RPC (including an exact workflowId selector) and then returns an observable daemon-managed run. The UI, workflow status, workflow await, lifecycle events, gates, and artifact timeline should all reflect the resumed execution. The existing standalone/in-process resume behavior should either be explicitly separated and named as such or retired for dae

📅 Opened Aug 18, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more TypeScript beginner tasks?Explore TypeScript GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for provos/ironcurtain

When evaluating whether to contribute to provos/ironcurtain, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of provos/ironcurtain acknowledge new external contributions in approximately 10 hours. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 0.0% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to provos/ironcurtain

01

Is provos/ironcurtain welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

provos/ironcurtain has a recorded first-timer success rate of 0.0%. Repositories ranked Risky typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~10 hours. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 29.9 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 29.9 places provos/ironcurtain in the Risky tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for provos/ironcurtain?

The external pull request merge rate is 0.0%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in provos/ironcurtain?

Yes, provos/ironcurtain currently has 1 active issue(s) tagged with beginner-friendly labels. You can inspect these directly from the repository issues tab.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for provos/ironcurtain are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.