project-minigraf/minigraf - Open Source PR Review Scorecard

Embedded graph memory for AI agents, mobile apps, and the browser.

C-Rank Grade: B (Solid) - 51/100

External PR Merge Rate: 11%

Response Time: -

First Timer Success: 100%

Frequently Asked Questions

Is project-minigraf/minigraf welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

project-minigraf/minigraf has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked B typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

Maintainers in project-minigraf/minigraf respond to incoming external pull requests in approximately 0.0 hours on average. Keeping PRs focused on single tasks and ensuring tests pass helps maintainers review faster.

What does the 50.8 C-Rank™ score (B Tier) represent?

The C-Rank™ system evaluates GitHub projects on a 0–100 scale using real data: PR merge rates, review turnaround time, active maintainer presence, and first-time contributor success. A score of 50.8 places project-minigraf/minigraf in the B tier.

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for project-minigraf/minigraf?

The external contributor pull request merge rate for project-minigraf/minigraf is 11.1%, based on public PR activity from non-core contributors.

Are there Good First Issues available in project-minigraf/minigraf?

project-minigraf/minigraf does not currently have active "good first issue" tags indexed, but accepts external contributions through standard GitHub issue tracking.

project-minigraf
project-minigraf/minigrafB•Solid197
GitHub
Back to Explorer
project-minigraf

project-minigraf/minigraf

197
Active (30d)B•Solid(51/100)Low Sample (<20 PRs)Rust

Embedded graph memory for AI agents, mobile apps, and the browser.

GitHub
Compare••
Jump to:

AI Maintainer Review Guidelines

Review Persona

Empathetic Technical Mentor

Warmth Score
7.6/10
Patience Score
8.2/10
Nitpick Rate
25%

Collaborative maintainer environment in project-minigraf/minigraf. Reviews community pull requests with focus on project quality.

What Contributors Actually Say

Discussions in project-minigraf/minigraf focus heavily on practical implementation feedback, code formatting standards, and issue reproduction details.

Hidden Friction Signals

Unlinked PRs without issue context and changes that fail automated test suites face the highest review friction.

Unwritten Rules

  • •1) Keep PR scope strictly aligned with the linked issue.
  • •2) Ensure local linters pass before opening a review.
  • •3) Maintain full test coverage for modified logic.

Top PR Submission Do's

  • •Add or update tests for changed behavior before requesting review
  • •Update docs or README when behavior changes
  • •Link the issue and include reproduction context in the PR

Top PR Friction Pitfalls (Don'ts)

  • •Do not leave requested test coverage unresolved
  • •Do not ship user-facing changes without matching docs
  • •Do not open context-free PRs
Response Velocity
-
No reviewer activity recorded

Average Response Latency

Tracks hours until a maintainer leaves a review, comment, or PR response.

Merge Efficiency
11.1%
Selective PR acceptance rate

External Acceptance Rate

Percentage of community pull requests successfully merged into main.

First-Timer Success
100.0%
Strong first-timer PR acceptance rate

First PR Conversion

Rate at which developers submitting their first repository PR succeed.

Active Maintainers
CRITICAL BUS FACTOR
Single maintainer
No active GitHub maintainers found (may review internally on Gerrit or internal tools)
Diagnostic Health HUD
11.1%
Merge Gauge
100.0%
1st-Timer
Community Vibe34/100

Embed C-Rank Badge

Show contributors that your repository actively reviews and merges external pull requests.

GetMerged C-Rank badge for project-minigraf/minigraf
[![GetMerged C-Rank](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/api/badge/project-minigraf/minigraf)](https://getmerged.abhishekco.de/project-minigraf/minigraf?utm_source=github&utm_medium=badge)

Active Good First Issues (1)

View on GitHub

Summary Cargo.toml enables uuid's v4 feature in the main [dependencies] (line 38, and the wasm target's entry on line 43). The library never calls it. It creates UUIDs only with v5: src/query/datalog/matcher.rs:733: a keyword entity becomes Uuid::new_v5(NAMESPACE_OID, keyword) src/query/datalog/magic_sets.rs:74: a v5 sentinel entity for magic-sets rewriting Uuid::new_v4 appears only in #[cfg(test)] modules, tests/, benches/, examples/ and three rustdoc examples (src/graph/types.rs:246,255, src/graph/storage.rs:79). The dev-dependency entry (Cargo.toml:71) already enables v4 for all of those. Ask Remove "v4" from the uuid features in [dependencies] and in the wasm target entry. Keep it in [dev-dependencies]. Check that cargo build, cargo test (including doctests), cargo build --target wasm32-unknown-unknown --features browser and the binary-size check all still pass. Note the size change, if any. If any wasm or browser build still needs getrandom/js without v4, decide what that depen

📅 Opened Oct 5, 2026💬 0 comments
Quality: 90/100Contribute
Looking for more Rust beginner tasks?Explore Rust GFI

Contributor Community Vibe Feedback

Rate what actually matters after opening a pull request here.

Have you contributed to this repo?

Rate your first-hand PR experience (review speed, maintainer responsiveness, and onboarding ease) to help other contributors.

3 ratings required
Maintainer helpfulness
Review speed
Beginner friendliness

Contributor Compatibility & Review Speed Analysis for project-minigraf/minigraf

When evaluating whether to contribute to project-minigraf/minigraf, response velocity and maintainer engagement are crucial. GetMerged continuously tracks pull request trajectories, first-comment latency, and code review rounds to help developers avoid submitting pull requests to backlogged repositories.

Currently, maintainers of project-minigraf/minigraf acknowledge new external contributions in approximately -. Out of all submitted pull requests from non-core authors in the last 180-day window, 11.1% were successfully merged into the primary branch.

Frequently Asked Questions - Contributing to project-minigraf/minigraf

01

Is project-minigraf/minigraf welcoming to first-time open-source contributors?

project-minigraf/minigraf has a recorded first-timer success rate of 100.0%. Repositories ranked Solid typically provide actionable feedback during code reviews and actively nurture new community contributors.

02

How fast can I expect code review feedback on my pull request?

The initial maintainer response time averages ~-. Keeping PRs scoped to single concerns and ensuring CI checks succeed will optimize review turnaround.

03

What does the 50.8 C-Rank™ score represent?

The C-Rank™ index scores repositories on a 0 to 100 scale using an objective formula: external PR merge rates, initial response speed, active maintainer count, and first-time contributor retention. A score of 50.8 places project-minigraf/minigraf in the Solid tier.

04

What is the external contributor pull request merge rate for project-minigraf/minigraf?

The external pull request merge rate is 11.1%. GetMerged isolates non-core community contributions so external developers get an accurate benchmark of PR acceptance probability.

05

Are there beginner Good First Issues open in project-minigraf/minigraf?

project-minigraf/minigraf does not have open beginner labels indexed currently, but external PRs for bugs and documentation improvements are evaluated via normal issue triage.

GetMerged C-Rank™ Indexing Standard

All metrics displayed for project-minigraf/minigraf are automatically retrieved via the public GitHub API and recalculated daily. Insider pull requests submitted by repository owners or organization members are excluded from merge rate calculations to preserve objective external contributor statistics.